An Investigation of IELTS and TOEFL iBT Score Compatibility

Masaya Kanzaki Kanda University of International Studies Reference Data: Kanzaki, M. (2024). An investigation of IELTS and TOEFL iBT score compatibility. In B. Lacy, R.P. Lege, & P. Ferguson, (Eds.), Growth Mindset in Language Education. JALT. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2023-43 This study details an analysis of the scores of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) test and the TOEFL Internet-based Test (TOEFL iBT), obtained from 53 university students in Japan, and assessed the validity of the two score comparison tables published by Educational Testing Service (2010) and by MEXT (2018). The findings indicated that 27 participants (50.9%) received the corresponding scores suggested in the Educational Testing Service table, while 15 (28.3%) received the CEFR-based corresponding scores suggested in the Ministry of Education table. Additionally, it was observed that participants who had more experience with either of the tests tended to score higher on that test than what was projected in the Educational Testing Service table. 本研究は、53名の日本の学生から集めたInternational English Language Testing System(IELTS)とTest of English as a Foreign Language Internet-based Test(TOEFL iBT)の得点を分析し、Educational Testing Service(2010)と文部科学省(2018)の得点対照表の妥当性を検証した。分析の結果、27名(50.9%)の参加者がEducational Testing Service の表で示されている対応得点を取得したが、文部科学省の表が示すCEFRに基づく対応得点を取ったのは、15名(28.3%)にとどまった。さらに、いずれかの試験の受験経験が豊富な参加者は、その試験の得点が、Educational Testing Serviceの表で予測されている対応得点よりも高くなる傾向があることが示された。

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltpcp2023-43
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Investigation of IELTS and TOEFL iBT Score Compatibility

Masaya Kanzaki
Power Systems and Technologies
article

An Investigation of IELTS and TOEFL iBT Score Compatibility

Masaya Kanzaki
article en

Abstract

Masaya Kanzaki Kanda University of International Studies Reference Data: Kanzaki, M. (2024). An investigation of IELTS and TOEFL iBT score compatibility. In B. Lacy, R.P. Lege, & P. Ferguson, (Eds.), Growth Mindset in Language Education. JALT. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2023-43 This study details an analysis of the scores of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) test and the TOEFL Internet-based Test (TOEFL iBT), obtained from 53 university students in Japan, and assessed the validity of the two score comparison tables published by Educational Testing Service (2010) and by MEXT (2018). The findings indicated that 27 participants (50.9%) received the corresponding scores suggested in the Educational Testing Service table, while 15 (28.3%) received the CEFR-based corresponding scores suggested in the Ministry of Education table. Additionally, it was observed that participants who had more experience with either of the tests tended to score higher on that test than what was projected in the Educational Testing Service table. 本研究は、53名の日本の学生から集めたInternational English Language Testing System(IELTS)とTest of English as a Foreign Language Internet-based Test(TOEFL iBT)の得点を分析し、Educational Testing Service(2010)と文部科学省(2018)の得点対照表の妥当性を検証した。分析の結果、27名(50.9%)の参加者がEducational Testing Service の表で示されている対応得点を取得したが、文部科学省の表が示すCEFRに基づく対応得点を取ったのは、15名(28.3%)にとどまった。さらに、いずれかの試験の受験経験が豊富な参加者は、その試験の得点が、Educational Testing Serviceの表で予測されている対応得点よりも高くなる傾向があることが示された。

Vol. 2023(1)
Kanda University of International Studies (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Power Systems and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.