The plausibility machine commonsense (PMC) dataset: A massively crowdsourced human-annotated dataset for studying plausibility in large language models

Commonsense reasoning has emerged as a challenging problem in Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, one area of commonsense reasoning that has not received nearly as much attention in the AI research community is <i>plausibility assessment</i>, which focuses on determining the likelihood of commonsense statements. Human-annotated benchmarks are essential for advancing research in this nascent area, as they enable researchers to develop and evaluate AI models effectively. Because plausibility is a subjective concept, it is important to obtain nuanced annotations, rather than a binary label of 'plausible' or 'implausible'. Furthermore, it is also important to obtain multiple human annotations for a given statement, to ensure validity of the labels. In this data article, we describe the process of re-annotating an existing commonsense plausibility dataset (SemEval-2020 Task 4) using large-scale crowdsourcing on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. We obtain 10,000 unique annotations on a corpus of 2000 sentences (five independent annotations per sentence). Based on these labels, each was labelled as <i>plausible, implausible, or ambiguous</i>. Next, we prompted the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models developed by OpenAI. Sentences from the human-annotated files were fed into the models using custom prompt templates, and the models' generated labels were used to determine if they were aligned with those output by humans. The PMC-Dataset is meant to serve as a rich resource for analysing and comparing human and machine commonsense reasoning capabilities, specifically on plausibility. Researchers can utilise this dataset to train, fine-tune, and evaluate AI models on plausibility. Applications include: determining the likelihood of everyday events, assessing the realism of hypothetical scenarios, and distinguishing between plausible and implausible statements in commonsense text. Ultimately, we intend for the dataset to support ongoing AI research by offering a robust foundation for developing models that are better aligned with human commonsense reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data in Brief
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110869
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The plausibility machine commonsense (PMC) dataset: A massively crowdsourced human-annotated dataset for studying plausibility in large language models

Ke Shen, Mayank Kejriwal, Navapat Nananukul
1 citations
Data in Brief
Topic Modeling
0.35
article

The plausibility machine commonsense (PMC) dataset: A massively crowdsourced human-annotated dataset for studying plausibility in large language models

Ke Shen, Mayank Kejriwal, Navapat Nananukul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Commonsense reasoning has emerged as a challenging problem in Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, one area of commonsense reasoning that has not received nearly as much attention in the AI research community is <i>plausibility assessment</i>, which focuses on determining the likelihood of commonsense statements. Human-annotated benchmarks are essential for advancing research in this nascent area, as they enable researchers to develop and evaluate AI models effectively. Because plausibility is a subjective concept, it is important to obtain nuanced annotations, rather than a binary label of 'plausible' or 'implausible'. Furthermore, it is also important to obtain multiple human annotations for a given statement, to ensure validity of the labels. In this data article, we describe the process of re-annotating an existing commonsense plausibility dataset (SemEval-2020 Task 4) using large-scale crowdsourcing on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. We obtain 10,000 unique annotations on a corpus of 2000 sentences (five independent annotations per sentence). Based on these labels, each was labelled as <i>plausible, implausible, or ambiguous</i>. Next, we prompted the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models developed by OpenAI. Sentences from the human-annotated files were fed into the models using custom prompt templates, and the models' generated labels were used to determine if they were aligned with those output by humans. The PMC-Dataset is meant to serve as a rich resource for analysing and comparing human and machine commonsense reasoning capabilities, specifically on plausibility. Researchers can utilise this dataset to train, fine-tune, and evaluate AI models on plausibility. Applications include: determining the likelihood of everyday events, assessing the realism of hypothetical scenarios, and distinguishing between plausible and implausible statements in commonsense text. Ultimately, we intend for the dataset to support ongoing AI research by offering a robust foundation for developing models that are better aligned with human commonsense reasoning.

Data in BriefVol. 57
University of Southern California (US)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Topic Modeling
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.