Subjective assessment of traffic rules compliance in Bulgaria: Role of personality and driving style

• The subjective assessment of compliance with traffic rules in Bulgaria is investigated in two different studies. • Study 1 finds that anxiety, sensation seeking, driving anger, and aggressive and risky driving behaviour significantly predict compliance with traffic rules. • Study 2 highlights the role of driving style revealing risky, irrational, distress-reduction, and patient and careful driving styles as significant predictors of this assessment. • Significant differences are found according to age, sex, driving experience, and negative driving outcomes. It is generally accepted that driving is safer when the rules are obeyed. Therefore, the pursuit of greater compliance with traffic rules is often seen as an intermediate goal in ensuring road safety. The article presents two studies that aim to investigate the subjective assessment of traffic rules compliance and the role of personality and behavioural factors such as anxiety, sensation seeking, driving anger, aggressive driving, and risky driving (Study 1; N=1433) on the one hand, and driving style (Study 2; N=456) on the other hand. The studies also examine the differences in traffic rules compliance by age, sex, driving experience, and negative driving outcomes such as registered violations, driving licence suspensions, and involvement traffic accidents. Self-report methods are used to assess personality factors, driving style, traffic rules compliance, and negative driving outcomes. The results show a generally positive assessment of compliance with traffic rules among the participants, with the majority reporting compliance in their daily driving behaviour. Study 1 indicates that all personality factors investigated are significant predictors of traffic rules compliance. Study 2 demonstrates that the risky style, the irrational style, the distress-reduction style, and the patient and careful style are significant predictors of traffic rule compliance. Demographic differences are also observed, with women being significantly more likely than men to perceive themselves as compliant drivers. In terms of negative driving outcomes, both studies demonstrate that individuals with a record of driving violations in the last three years, a suspended driving licence, and involvement in a traffic accident are significantly less likely to rate themselves as compliant. The results can contribute to the development of prevention programmes and road safety strategies to promote safer driving behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.013
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective assessment of traffic rules compliance in Bulgaria: Role of personality and driving style

Zornitsa Totkova
5 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Traffic and Road Safety
1.82
article

Subjective assessment of traffic rules compliance in Bulgaria: Role of personality and driving style

Zornitsa Totkova
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• The subjective assessment of compliance with traffic rules in Bulgaria is investigated in two different studies. • Study 1 finds that anxiety, sensation seeking, driving anger, and aggressive and risky driving behaviour significantly predict compliance with traffic rules. • Study 2 highlights the role of driving style revealing risky, irrational, distress-reduction, and patient and careful driving styles as significant predictors of this assessment. • Significant differences are found according to age, sex, driving experience, and negative driving outcomes. It is generally accepted that driving is safer when the rules are obeyed. Therefore, the pursuit of greater compliance with traffic rules is often seen as an intermediate goal in ensuring road safety. The article presents two studies that aim to investigate the subjective assessment of traffic rules compliance and the role of personality and behavioural factors such as anxiety, sensation seeking, driving anger, aggressive driving, and risky driving (Study 1; N=1433) on the one hand, and driving style (Study 2; N=456) on the other hand. The studies also examine the differences in traffic rules compliance by age, sex, driving experience, and negative driving outcomes such as registered violations, driving licence suspensions, and involvement traffic accidents. Self-report methods are used to assess personality factors, driving style, traffic rules compliance, and negative driving outcomes. The results show a generally positive assessment of compliance with traffic rules among the participants, with the majority reporting compliance in their daily driving behaviour. Study 1 indicates that all personality factors investigated are significant predictors of traffic rules compliance. Study 2 demonstrates that the risky style, the irrational style, the distress-reduction style, and the patient and careful style are significant predictors of traffic rule compliance. Demographic differences are also observed, with women being significantly more likely than men to perceive themselves as compliant drivers. In terms of negative driving outcomes, both studies demonstrate that individuals with a record of driving violations in the last three years, a suspended driving licence, and involvement in a traffic accident are significantly less likely to rate themselves as compliant. The results can contribute to the development of prevention programmes and road safety strategies to promote safer driving behaviour.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 106
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Traffic and Road Safety
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.