Promoting Aboriginal Women’s Human Rights – Understanding When not to Prosecute Aboriginal Women

Legal assessments required by the law of self-defence cannot be made in the absence of an accurate understanding of the violence a person faced before they used force. This article shows how prosecutors are making errors in their decisions to prosecute Aboriginal women who have killed an abusive partner, due to inaccurate understandings of the violence faced by defendants in these circumstances. We argue this error is a fundamental error of law, not one of fact and discretionary authority. It amounts to prosecutors making decisions to prosecute Aboriginal women (and accept guilty pleas) in the absence of a prima facie case. We argue that such decisions by prosecutors can be challenged via an application for stay of proceedings for abuse of process or a ‘no case’ submission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3529
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting Aboriginal Women’s Human Rights – Understanding When not to Prosecute Aboriginal Women

Hannah McGlade, Stella Tarrant, Carol Bahemia
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Promoting Aboriginal Women’s Human Rights – Understanding When not to Prosecute Aboriginal Women

Hannah McGlade, Stella Tarrant, Carol Bahemia
article en

Abstract

Legal assessments required by the law of self-defence cannot be made in the absence of an accurate understanding of the violence a person faced before they used force. This article shows how prosecutors are making errors in their decisions to prosecute Aboriginal women who have killed an abusive partner, due to inaccurate understandings of the violence faced by defendants in these circumstances. We argue this error is a fundamental error of law, not one of fact and discretionary authority. It amounts to prosecutors making decisions to prosecute Aboriginal women (and accept guilty pleas) in the absence of a prima facie case. We argue that such decisions by prosecutors can be challenged via an application for stay of proceedings for abuse of process or a ‘no case’ submission.

International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.