De la cranioscopie à la craniologie et au-de-là, la quête d’une paléo-pathologie mentale

From the end of the 18th century to the middle of the 19th century, cranioscopy, or phrenology, claimed to diagnose deviant behaviour by examining cranial reliefs. This lead would not come to fruition but would allow the collection of a significant body of material that would be used to develop craniometry as a descriptive science of human diversity. Recent developments in brain imaging, however, show that while phrenology had anticipated the functional areas of the brain, it is now only of historical interest and contributes nothing to bioarchaeology. This leads us to think that future efforts to attempt to construct a mental, or even social, palaeopathology, which currently does not exist, will turn away from anatomy and, thanks to palaeogenomics, venture into psychogenetics, a field that remains very controversial.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62526/x83lcu
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De la cranioscopie à la craniologie et au-de-là, la quête d’une paléo-pathologie mentale

Alain Froment
The Journal of the International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
article

De la cranioscopie à la craniologie et au-de-là, la quête d’une paléo-pathologie mentale

Alain Froment
article en

Abstract

From the end of the 18th century to the middle of the 19th century, cranioscopy, or phrenology, claimed to diagnose deviant behaviour by examining cranial reliefs. This lead would not come to fruition but would allow the collection of a significant body of material that would be used to develop craniometry as a descriptive science of human diversity. Recent developments in brain imaging, however, show that while phrenology had anticipated the functional areas of the brain, it is now only of historical interest and contributes nothing to bioarchaeology. This leads us to think that future efforts to attempt to construct a mental, or even social, palaeopathology, which currently does not exist, will turn away from anatomy and, thanks to palaeogenomics, venture into psychogenetics, a field that remains very controversial.

The Journal of the International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric SciencesVol. 6(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.