Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty

Abstract The current geopolitical instability has driven global policy frameworks to prioritize economic security. This shift has intensified the debate on technology sovereignty among developed countries, due to concerns over supply chain disruptions and competition for future technologies. However, equating technology sovereignty with techno-nationalism should be avoided. Techno-nationalism can lead to unrealistic goals of domestically possessing all necessary technologies, resulting in protectionism. Given the complex and interconnected nature of technological development, no single country can control all component technologies. This study proposes a concept of collaborative technology sovereignty, promoting openness in technology development and acquisition. Policies should focus on creating systems for sharing technologies with like-minded countries while securing critical technologies. Lessons from existing policies are essential for expanding this collaborative approach and establishing strategies for collaborative technology sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae046
Citations
6
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty

S.-G. Lee, Hanbin Kim, Jeong‐Dong Lee, S. Si
6 citations
Science and Public Policy
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
4.39
article

Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty

S.-G. Lee, Hanbin Kim, Jeong‐Dong Lee, S. Si
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The current geopolitical instability has driven global policy frameworks to prioritize economic security. This shift has intensified the debate on technology sovereignty among developed countries, due to concerns over supply chain disruptions and competition for future technologies. However, equating technology sovereignty with techno-nationalism should be avoided. Techno-nationalism can lead to unrealistic goals of domestically possessing all necessary technologies, resulting in protectionism. Given the complex and interconnected nature of technological development, no single country can control all component technologies. This study proposes a concept of collaborative technology sovereignty, promoting openness in technology development and acquisition. Policies should focus on creating systems for sharing technologies with like-minded countries while securing critical technologies. Lessons from existing policies are essential for expanding this collaborative approach and establishing strategies for collaborative technology sovereignty.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 51(6)
Seoul National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
4.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty — S.-G. Lee, Hanbin Kim, et al. · Science and Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS