The great equalizer? Mixed effects of social infrastructure on diverse encounters in cities

Casual encounters with diverse groups of people in urban spaces have been shown to foster social capital and trust, leading to higher quality of life, civic participation, and community resilience to hazards. To promote such diverse encounters and cultivate social ties, policymakers develop social infrastructure sites, such as community centers, parks, and plazas. However, their effects on the diversity of encounters, compared to baseline sites (e.g., grocery stores), have not been fully understood. In this study, we use a large-scale, privacy-enhanced mobility dataset of >120 K anonymized mobile phone users in the Boston area to evaluate the effects of social infrastructure sites on the observed frequencies of inter-income and inter-race encounters. Contrary to our intuition that all social infrastructure sites promote diverse encounters, we find the effects to be mixed and more nuanced. Overall, parks and social businesses promote more inter-income encounters, while community spaces promote more same-income encounters, but each produces opposite effects for inter-race encounters. Parks and community spaces located in low-income neighborhoods were shown to result in higher inter-income and inter-race encounters compared to ordinary sites, respectively, however, their associations were insignificant in high-income areas. These empirical results suggest that the type of social infrastructure and neighborhood traits may alter levels of diverse encounters. • Mobile phone location data was used to analyze the effects of social infrastructure on the income and race diversity of urban encounters. • Parks and social businesses were linked to an increase in 1.5% and 2.5% of inter-income encounters, respectively, compared to baseline sites. • Community spaces were conversely linked to more same-income encounters, where a median community space experiences a 0.7% boost in same-income encounters. • Social infrastructure is not a catch-all panacea for social divides, since some types produced opposite effects for inter-race and inter-income encounters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers Environment and Urban Systems
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102173
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The great equalizer? Mixed effects of social infrastructure on diverse encounters in cities

Timothy Fraser, Daniel P. Aldrich, Takahiro Yabe, Esteban Moro
8 citations
Computers Environment and Urban Systems
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
9.06
article

The great equalizer? Mixed effects of social infrastructure on diverse encounters in cities

Timothy Fraser, Daniel P. Aldrich, Takahiro Yabe, Esteban Moro
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Casual encounters with diverse groups of people in urban spaces have been shown to foster social capital and trust, leading to higher quality of life, civic participation, and community resilience to hazards. To promote such diverse encounters and cultivate social ties, policymakers develop social infrastructure sites, such as community centers, parks, and plazas. However, their effects on the diversity of encounters, compared to baseline sites (e.g., grocery stores), have not been fully understood. In this study, we use a large-scale, privacy-enhanced mobility dataset of >120 K anonymized mobile phone users in the Boston area to evaluate the effects of social infrastructure sites on the observed frequencies of inter-income and inter-race encounters. Contrary to our intuition that all social infrastructure sites promote diverse encounters, we find the effects to be mixed and more nuanced. Overall, parks and social businesses promote more inter-income encounters, while community spaces promote more same-income encounters, but each produces opposite effects for inter-race encounters. Parks and community spaces located in low-income neighborhoods were shown to result in higher inter-income and inter-race encounters compared to ordinary sites, respectively, however, their associations were insignificant in high-income areas. These empirical results suggest that the type of social infrastructure and neighborhood traits may alter levels of diverse encounters. • Mobile phone location data was used to analyze the effects of social infrastructure on the income and race diversity of urban encounters. • Parks and social businesses were linked to an increase in 1.5% and 2.5% of inter-income encounters, respectively, compared to baseline sites. • Community spaces were conversely linked to more same-income encounters, where a median community space experiences a 0.7% boost in same-income encounters. • Social infrastructure is not a catch-all panacea for social divides, since some types produced opposite effects for inter-race and inter-income encounters.

Computers Environment and Urban SystemsVol. 113
Northeastern University (US), Cornell University (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), New York City College of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
9.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.