Climate change does not impact the water flow of barley at the vegetative stage, ameliorates at anthesis and worsens after subsequent drought episodes

Climate change will bring the interaction of stresses such as increased temperature and drought under high [CO<sub>2</sub>] conditions. This is likely to impact on crop growth and productivity. This study aimed to (i) determine the response of barley water relations to vegetative and anthesis drought periods under triple interaction conditions, (ii) test the possibility to prime barley plants for drought, and (iii) analyse the involvement of aquaporins in (i) and (ii). The water status of barley was not affected by drought at the vegetative stage, regardless of the environmental conditions. At the anthesis stage, when the water shortage period was more severe, barley plants growing under combined elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature conditions were able to maintain a better water status compared with plants grown under current conditions. Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature conditions reduced the stomatal conductance and slowed down the plant water flow through a root-leaf hydraulic conductivity coordination. Leaf HvPIP2;1 and HvTIP1;1 aquaporins seemed to play a key role regulating barley's water flow, while leaf and root HvPIP2;5 provided basic level of water flow. At anthesis drought and under future combined conditions, plants showed a reduced cell dehydration and decrease in leaf relative water content compared with plants grown under current conditions. Exposure to a previous drought did not prime the water status of barley plants to a subsequent drought, but instead worsened the response under future conditions. This was due to an imbalance between the roots versus shoot development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109060
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant responses to water stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change does not impact the water flow of barley at the vegetative stage, ameliorates at anthesis and worsens after subsequent drought episodes

Ander Yoldi‐Achalandabaso, Alberto Muñoz‐Rueda, Jon Miranda‐Apodaca, Rubén Vicente et al.
3 citations
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Plant responses to water stress
1.80
article

Climate change does not impact the water flow of barley at the vegetative stage, ameliorates at anthesis and worsens after subsequent drought episodes

Ander Yoldi‐Achalandabaso, Alberto Muñoz‐Rueda, Jon Miranda‐Apodaca, Rubén Vicente, Usue Pérez‐López, Wieland Fricke
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Climate change will bring the interaction of stresses such as increased temperature and drought under high [CO<sub>2</sub>] conditions. This is likely to impact on crop growth and productivity. This study aimed to (i) determine the response of barley water relations to vegetative and anthesis drought periods under triple interaction conditions, (ii) test the possibility to prime barley plants for drought, and (iii) analyse the involvement of aquaporins in (i) and (ii). The water status of barley was not affected by drought at the vegetative stage, regardless of the environmental conditions. At the anthesis stage, when the water shortage period was more severe, barley plants growing under combined elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature conditions were able to maintain a better water status compared with plants grown under current conditions. Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature conditions reduced the stomatal conductance and slowed down the plant water flow through a root-leaf hydraulic conductivity coordination. Leaf HvPIP2;1 and HvTIP1;1 aquaporins seemed to play a key role regulating barley's water flow, while leaf and root HvPIP2;5 provided basic level of water flow. At anthesis drought and under future combined conditions, plants showed a reduced cell dehydration and decrease in leaf relative water content compared with plants grown under current conditions. Exposure to a previous drought did not prime the water status of barley plants to a subsequent drought, but instead worsened the response under future conditions. This was due to an imbalance between the roots versus shoot development.

Plant Physiology and BiochemistryVol. 215
University College Dublin (IE), University of the Basque Country (ES), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Eusko Jaurlaritza, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant responses to water stress
1.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.