Adapting standardized trout monitoring to a changing climate for the upper Yellowstone River, Montana, USA

Abstract Objective Long-term standardized monitoring programs are fundamental to assessing how fish populations respond to anthropogenic stressors. Standardized monitoring programs may need to adopt new methods to adapt to rapid environmental changes that are associated with a changing climate. In the upper Yellowstone River, Montana, biologists have used a standardized, mark–recapture monitoring protocol to annually estimate the abundance of trout since 1978 to assess population status and trends. However, within the past two decades, climate change has caused changes in discharge timing that have prevented standardized monitoring from occurring annually. Methods We investigated the feasibility of using two analytical methods, N-mixture models and mean capture probability, for estimating the abundance of three trout species in the upper Yellowstone River using the historical long-term data set; these methods allow abundance to be estimated when a mark–recapture estimate cannot be obtained due to hydrologic conditions. Result When compared with abundance estimates from mark–recapture methods, N-mixture models most often resulted in negatively biased abundance estimates, whereas mean capture probability analyses resulted in positively biased abundance estimates. Additionally, N-mixture models produced negatively biased estimates when tested against true abundance values from simulated data sets. The bias in the N-mixture model estimates was caused by poor model fit and variation in capture probability. The bias in the mean capture probability estimates was caused by heterogeneity in capture probability, likely caused by variable environmental conditions, which were not accounted for in the models. Conclusion N-mixture models and mean capture probability are not viable alternatives for estimating abundance in the upper Yellowstone River. Thus, exploring additional adaptations to sampling methodologies and analytical approaches, including models that require individually marked fish, will be valuable for this system. Climate change will undoubtedly necessitate changes to standardized sampling methods throughout the world; thus, developing alternative sampling and analytical methods will be important for maintaining the utility of long-term data sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting standardized trout monitoring to a changing climate for the upper Yellowstone River, Montana, USA

Jay J. Rotella, Hayley C. Glassic, David A. Schmetterling, Michelle A. Briggs et al.
2 citations
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
1.38
article

Adapting standardized trout monitoring to a changing climate for the upper Yellowstone River, Montana, USA

Jay J. Rotella, Hayley C. Glassic, David A. Schmetterling, Michelle A. Briggs, Scott T. Opitz, Christopher S. Guy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective Long-term standardized monitoring programs are fundamental to assessing how fish populations respond to anthropogenic stressors. Standardized monitoring programs may need to adopt new methods to adapt to rapid environmental changes that are associated with a changing climate. In the upper Yellowstone River, Montana, biologists have used a standardized, mark–recapture monitoring protocol to annually estimate the abundance of trout since 1978 to assess population status and trends. However, within the past two decades, climate change has caused changes in discharge timing that have prevented standardized monitoring from occurring annually. Methods We investigated the feasibility of using two analytical methods, N-mixture models and mean capture probability, for estimating the abundance of three trout species in the upper Yellowstone River using the historical long-term data set; these methods allow abundance to be estimated when a mark–recapture estimate cannot be obtained due to hydrologic conditions. Result When compared with abundance estimates from mark–recapture methods, N-mixture models most often resulted in negatively biased abundance estimates, whereas mean capture probability analyses resulted in positively biased abundance estimates. Additionally, N-mixture models produced negatively biased estimates when tested against true abundance values from simulated data sets. The bias in the N-mixture model estimates was caused by poor model fit and variation in capture probability. The bias in the mean capture probability estimates was caused by heterogeneity in capture probability, likely caused by variable environmental conditions, which were not accounted for in the models. Conclusion N-mixture models and mean capture probability are not viable alternatives for estimating abundance in the upper Yellowstone River. Thus, exploring additional adaptations to sampling methodologies and analytical approaches, including models that require individually marked fish, will be valuable for this system. Climate change will undoubtedly necessitate changes to standardized sampling methods throughout the world; thus, developing alternative sampling and analytical methods will be important for maintaining the utility of long-term data sets.

North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementVol. 44(5)
United States Geological Survey (US), Montana State University (US), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US), Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.