Building Democratic Resilience: Protecting the Public Sphere From Violent Extremism

This paper focuses on the challenges violent extremism poses to the functioning of the public sphere—a critical aspect often overlooked in discussions surrounding violent extremism. It proposes a novel framework of democratic resilience to examine and improve the public sphere responses to violent extremism. Combining insights from the normative theory of deliberative democracy with the empirical study of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) initiatives in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the paper lays out the concrete steps democracies can take to protect the public sphere from extremist threats and attacks. While the primary focus of analysis is NSW, the empirical insights have implications for other jurisdictions and countries seeking to counter violent extremism without compromising democratic commitments and principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241271209
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Democratic Resilience: Protecting the Public Sphere From Violent Extremism

Jordan McSwiney, Péter Bálint, John S. Dryzek, Selen A. Ercan
8 citations
Crime & Delinquency
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
9.06
article

Building Democratic Resilience: Protecting the Public Sphere From Violent Extremism

Jordan McSwiney, Péter Bálint, John S. Dryzek, Selen A. Ercan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This paper focuses on the challenges violent extremism poses to the functioning of the public sphere—a critical aspect often overlooked in discussions surrounding violent extremism. It proposes a novel framework of democratic resilience to examine and improve the public sphere responses to violent extremism. Combining insights from the normative theory of deliberative democracy with the empirical study of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) initiatives in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the paper lays out the concrete steps democracies can take to protect the public sphere from extremist threats and attacks. While the primary focus of analysis is NSW, the empirical insights have implications for other jurisdictions and countries seeking to counter violent extremism without compromising democratic commitments and principles.

Crime & DelinquencyVol. 71(3)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
9.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.