Comparison between modified RECIST and WHO criteria for assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma

In 2010, modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria were presented to address the unique characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our goal was to compare mRECIST and WHO criteria in the treatment response after local and systemic therapies. Additionally, we aimed to improve the assessment of progression, which could be misinterpreted by conventional RECIST 1.1 and WHO criteria due to clinical events associated with chronic liver disease progression (e.g., ascites, lymph node enlargement). mRECIST has been used in clinical practice guidelines for managing HCC in Europe, America, and Asia. Today, mRECIST is the standard tool for assessing responses in the early and middle stages of HCC. We used both methods ( mRECIST and WHO criteria) in assessment of the same patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and then compared the results with post treatment level of alpha fetoprotein (AFP). We concluded that mRECIST is a reliable, applicable and preferable in tumor response assessment of HCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2024.304988.1752
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between modified RECIST and WHO criteria for assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Ahmed M. Yassen, Alzahraa Ahmed Moftah, Adel Mohammed Samy Mohsen, Ashraf Mohamed Hassan Elsherif
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison between modified RECIST and WHO criteria for assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Ahmed M. Yassen, Alzahraa Ahmed Moftah, Adel Mohammed Samy Mohsen, Ashraf Mohamed Hassan Elsherif
article en

Abstract

In 2010, modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria were presented to address the unique characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our goal was to compare mRECIST and WHO criteria in the treatment response after local and systemic therapies. Additionally, we aimed to improve the assessment of progression, which could be misinterpreted by conventional RECIST 1.1 and WHO criteria due to clinical events associated with chronic liver disease progression (e.g., ascites, lymph node enlargement). mRECIST has been used in clinical practice guidelines for managing HCC in Europe, America, and Asia. Today, mRECIST is the standard tool for assessing responses in the early and middle stages of HCC. We used both methods ( mRECIST and WHO criteria) in assessment of the same patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and then compared the results with post treatment level of alpha fetoprotein (AFP). We concluded that mRECIST is a reliable, applicable and preferable in tumor response assessment of HCC.

Minia Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 0(0)
Minia University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison between modified RECIST and WHO criteria for assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma — Ahmed M. Yassen, Alzahraa Ahmed Moftah, et al. · Minia Journal of Medical Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS