Model Biases in Simulating Extreme Sea Ice Loss Associated With the Record January 2022 Arctic Cyclone

Abstract In January 2022, the strongest Arctic cyclone on record resulted in a record weekly loss in sea ice cover in the Barents‐Kara‐Laptev seas. While ECMWF operational forecasts skillfully predicted the cyclone, the loss in sea ice was poorly predicted. We explore the ocean's response to the cyclone using observations from an Argo float that was profiling in the region, and investigate model biases in simulating the observed sea ice loss in a fully coupled GCM. The observations showed changes over the whole ocean column in the Barents Sea after the passage of the storm, cooling and mixing with enough implied heat release to melt roughly 1 m of sea ice. We replicate the observed cyclone in the GCM by nudging the model's winds to observations above the boundary layer. In these simulations, the associated loss of sea ice is only about 10%–15% of the observed loss, and the ocean exhibits very small changes in response to the cyclone. With the use of a simple 1‐D ice‐ocean model, we find that the overly strong ocean stratification in the GCM may be a significant source of model bias in its simulated response to the cyclone. However, even initialized with observed stratification profiles, the 1‐D model also underestimated mixing and sea ice melt relative to the observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jc021127
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Biases in Simulating Extreme Sea Ice Loss Associated With the Record January 2022 Arctic Cyclone

Christopher Horvat, Edward Blanchard‐Wrigglesworth, Melinda Webster, Samuel Brenner et al.
5 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.88
article

Model Biases in Simulating Extreme Sea Ice Loss Associated With the Record January 2022 Arctic Cyclone

Christopher Horvat, Edward Blanchard‐Wrigglesworth, Melinda Webster, Samuel Brenner, Cecilia M. Bitz, Øyvind Foss
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract In January 2022, the strongest Arctic cyclone on record resulted in a record weekly loss in sea ice cover in the Barents‐Kara‐Laptev seas. While ECMWF operational forecasts skillfully predicted the cyclone, the loss in sea ice was poorly predicted. We explore the ocean's response to the cyclone using observations from an Argo float that was profiling in the region, and investigate model biases in simulating the observed sea ice loss in a fully coupled GCM. The observations showed changes over the whole ocean column in the Barents Sea after the passage of the storm, cooling and mixing with enough implied heat release to melt roughly 1 m of sea ice. We replicate the observed cyclone in the GCM by nudging the model's winds to observations above the boundary layer. In these simulations, the associated loss of sea ice is only about 10%–15% of the observed loss, and the ocean exhibits very small changes in response to the cyclone. With the use of a simple 1‐D ice‐ocean model, we find that the overly strong ocean stratification in the GCM may be a significant source of model bias in its simulated response to the cyclone. However, even initialized with observed stratification profiles, the 1‐D model also underestimated mixing and sea ice melt relative to the observations.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 129(8)
University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Norwegian Polar Institute (NO)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, China Medical Board, Colorado Humanities, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Office of Naval Research
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.