Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants

<h3>Background</h3> Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon’s treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment. <h3>Methods</h3> This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal. <h3>Results</h3> In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by &gt;10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 4.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8637
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants

Justin S. Smith, Christopher Pearson Ames, Saeed S. Sadrameli, Sigurd Berven et al.
3 citations
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
1.72
article

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants

Justin S. Smith, Christopher Pearson Ames, Saeed S. Sadrameli, Sigurd Berven, Donald J. Blaskiewicz, Chun-Po Yen, Gregory M. Mundis, Michele Temple‐Wong, Rodrigo Junqueira Nicolau, Roland Kent, Joseph A. Osorio, Jahangir Asghar, Ashvin I. Patel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon’s treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment. <h3>Methods</h3> This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal. <h3>Results</h3> In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by &gt;10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 4.

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 18(S1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Kennedy Space Center (US), North Idaho College (US), AdventHealth Celebration (US), University of California System (US), University of California San Diego (US), Orthopedic Center (US), Ankara Spine Center (TR), St. Luke’s Boise Medical Center (US), Scripps Clinic (US), Elite Wellness (US), Neurological Surgery (US), University of Virginia (US)
Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation, NuVasive
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.