Reliability estimation for individual predictions in machine learning systems: A model reliability-based approach

The conventional aggregated performance measure (i.e., mean squared error) with respect to the whole dataset would not provide desired safety and quality assurance for each individual prediction made by a machine learning model in risk-sensitive regression problems. In this paper, we propose an informative indicator ℛ x to quantify model reliability for individual prediction (MRIP) for the purpose of safeguarding the usage of machine learning (ML) models in mission-critical applications. Specifically, we define the reliability of a ML model with respect to its prediction on each individual input x as the probability of the observed difference between the prediction of ML model and the actual observation falling within a small interval when the input x varies within a small range subject to a preset distance constraint, namely ℛ x = P y ∗ − y ̂ ∗ ≤ ε x ∗ ∈ B x , where y ∗ denotes the observed target value for the input x ∗ , y ̂ ∗ denotes the model prediction for the input x ∗ , and x ∗ is an input in the neighborhood of x subject to the constraint B x = x ∗ x ∗ − x ≤ δ . The developed MRIP indicator ℛ x provides a direct, objective, quantitative, and general-purpose measure of “reliability” or the probability of success of the ML model for each individual prediction by fully exploiting the local information associated with the input x and ML model. Next, to mitigate the intensive computational effort involved in MRIP estimation, we develop a two-stage ML-based framework to directly learn the relationship between x and its MRIP ℛ x , thus enabling to provide the reliability estimate ℛ x for any unseen input instantly. Thirdly, we propose an information gain-based approach to help determine a threshold value pertaing to ℛ x in support of decision makings on when to accept or abstain from counting on the ML model prediction. Comprehensive computational experiments and quantitative comparisons with existing methods on a broad range of real-world datasets reveal that the developed ML-based framework for MRIP estimation shows a robust performance in improving the reliability estimate of individual prediction, and the MRIP indicator ℛ x thus provides an essential layer of safety net when adopting ML models in risk-sensitive environments. • A quantitative indicator is developed to quantify the reliability of each individual prediction produced by ML model • The developed reliability indicator considers the uncertainties associated with input and output simultaneously • A two-stage ML-based method is developed to facilitate the estimation of MRIP value • Computational experiments and comparisons clearly demonstrate the advantage of the developed approach

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Support Systems
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2024.114305
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability estimation for individual predictions in machine learning systems: A model reliability-based approach

Indranil Bose, Xiaoge Zhang
11 citations
Decision Support Systems
Fault Detection and Control Systems
3.61
article

Reliability estimation for individual predictions in machine learning systems: A model reliability-based approach

Indranil Bose, Xiaoge Zhang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The conventional aggregated performance measure (i.e., mean squared error) with respect to the whole dataset would not provide desired safety and quality assurance for each individual prediction made by a machine learning model in risk-sensitive regression problems. In this paper, we propose an informative indicator ℛ x to quantify model reliability for individual prediction (MRIP) for the purpose of safeguarding the usage of machine learning (ML) models in mission-critical applications. Specifically, we define the reliability of a ML model with respect to its prediction on each individual input x as the probability of the observed difference between the prediction of ML model and the actual observation falling within a small interval when the input x varies within a small range subject to a preset distance constraint, namely ℛ x = P y ∗ − y ̂ ∗ ≤ ε x ∗ ∈ B x , where y ∗ denotes the observed target value for the input x ∗ , y ̂ ∗ denotes the model prediction for the input x ∗ , and x ∗ is an input in the neighborhood of x subject to the constraint B x = x ∗ x ∗ − x ≤ δ . The developed MRIP indicator ℛ x provides a direct, objective, quantitative, and general-purpose measure of “reliability” or the probability of success of the ML model for each individual prediction by fully exploiting the local information associated with the input x and ML model. Next, to mitigate the intensive computational effort involved in MRIP estimation, we develop a two-stage ML-based framework to directly learn the relationship between x and its MRIP ℛ x , thus enabling to provide the reliability estimate ℛ x for any unseen input instantly. Thirdly, we propose an information gain-based approach to help determine a threshold value pertaing to ℛ x in support of decision makings on when to accept or abstain from counting on the ML model prediction. Comprehensive computational experiments and quantitative comparisons with existing methods on a broad range of real-world datasets reveal that the developed ML-based framework for MRIP estimation shows a robust performance in improving the reliability estimate of individual prediction, and the MRIP indicator ℛ x thus provides an essential layer of safety net when adopting ML models in risk-sensitive environments. • A quantitative indicator is developed to quantify the reliability of each individual prediction produced by ML model • The developed reliability indicator considers the uncertainties associated with input and output simultaneously • A two-stage ML-based method is developed to facilitate the estimation of MRIP value • Computational experiments and comparisons clearly demonstrate the advantage of the developed approach

Decision Support SystemsVol. 186
NEOMA Business School (FR), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.