Evaluation of RC Special Structural Walls Reinforced with Cold-Rolled Ribbed Steel Bar Welded Mesh under Axial and Lateral Loads

Cold-rolled ribbed steel bar welded mesh (CRWM) is used to speed construction and improve the quality of the reinforcing. However, the seismic performance of such RC walls is uncertain. The current study assessed the seismic efficacy of these walls by analyzing the effects of different combinations of axial and cyclic lateral loading in a large-scale experimental program. The walls were built with boundary elements at the ends and two layers of mesh placed into the web of the walls. The seismic parameters comprise a force-displacement hysteresis curve, concrete and rebar strains, dissipated energy, and stiffness. The experimental findings show that the axial load had a significant effect on the deformation capacity, strength, and failure mode of the wall. Except for walls with flexural failure, the study revealed that the use of such mesh had a detrimental effect on the cyclic performance of other specimens. In walls exhibiting flexural failure modes, such as C15, the use of CRWM slightly improves ductility compared to the ASCE 41-17 proposed model. The use of such mesh in walls with any type of shear failure mode had a significantly negative influence on the seismic performance of the walls. Among shear failure modes, sliding shear failure is particularly adverse. In such failures, the vertical rebars are subjected to deformation perpendicular to their direction. Because of their brittle nature, they cannot accommodate this deformation and are prone to fracture. Moreover, a comparison of the experimental backbone curve of the walls and the numerical model proposed by ASCE 41-17 revealed that the ASCE model tended to overestimate the effective stiffness of walls with axial loads of less than 10% fc′Ag.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-13232
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of RC Special Structural Walls Reinforced with Cold-Rolled Ribbed Steel Bar Welded Mesh under Axial and Lateral Loads

M. Ghorbani, Mohsen Ghasemi, Morteza Bastami, Abdolreza S. Moghadam et al.
1 citations
Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.26
article

Evaluation of RC Special Structural Walls Reinforced with Cold-Rolled Ribbed Steel Bar Welded Mesh under Axial and Lateral Loads

M. Ghorbani, Mohsen Ghasemi, Morteza Bastami, Abdolreza S. Moghadam, M. Salehi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cold-rolled ribbed steel bar welded mesh (CRWM) is used to speed construction and improve the quality of the reinforcing. However, the seismic performance of such RC walls is uncertain. The current study assessed the seismic efficacy of these walls by analyzing the effects of different combinations of axial and cyclic lateral loading in a large-scale experimental program. The walls were built with boundary elements at the ends and two layers of mesh placed into the web of the walls. The seismic parameters comprise a force-displacement hysteresis curve, concrete and rebar strains, dissipated energy, and stiffness. The experimental findings show that the axial load had a significant effect on the deformation capacity, strength, and failure mode of the wall. Except for walls with flexural failure, the study revealed that the use of such mesh had a detrimental effect on the cyclic performance of other specimens. In walls exhibiting flexural failure modes, such as C15, the use of CRWM slightly improves ductility compared to the ASCE 41-17 proposed model. The use of such mesh in walls with any type of shear failure mode had a significantly negative influence on the seismic performance of the walls. Among shear failure modes, sliding shear failure is particularly adverse. In such failures, the vertical rebars are subjected to deformation perpendicular to their direction. Because of their brittle nature, they cannot accommodate this deformation and are prone to fracture. Moreover, a comparison of the experimental backbone curve of the walls and the numerical model proposed by ASCE 41-17 revealed that the ASCE model tended to overestimate the effective stiffness of walls with axial loads of less than 10% fc′Ag.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 150(11)
International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.