A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study

Complex hemodynamics, such as paradoxical "low-flow low-gradient (LG)" Aortic stenosis (AS) can be difficult to diagnose. Currently, mean transvalvular pressure-drop and flow-derived aortic-valve-area assess AS severity. Aortic valve coefficient (AVC) is a novel index which combines both pressure-drop and flow measurements to assess the severity of AS. A total of 47 patients (72 data points) were studied undergoing TAVR. In LG AS patients, t-test comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 % showed that AVC are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48). Therefore, AVC could be a better index.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study

Marepalli B. Rao, Shreyash Manegaonkar, Rishi Sukhija, Rupak K. Banerjee et al.
1 citations
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
article

A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study

Marepalli B. Rao, Shreyash Manegaonkar, Rishi Sukhija, Rupak K. Banerjee, Mohamed A Effat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Complex hemodynamics, such as paradoxical "low-flow low-gradient (LG)" Aortic stenosis (AS) can be difficult to diagnose. Currently, mean transvalvular pressure-drop and flow-derived aortic-valve-area assess AS severity. Aortic valve coefficient (AVC) is a novel index which combines both pressure-drop and flow measurements to assess the severity of AS. A total of 47 patients (72 data points) were studied undergoing TAVR. In LG AS patients, t-test comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 % showed that AVC are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48). Therefore, AVC could be a better index.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicineVol. 74
Cincinnati Health Department (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, McMicken College of Arts and Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study — Marepalli B. Rao, Shreyash Manegaonkar, et al. · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS