Racial capitalism’s role in mitigation deterrence from carbon removal

Two major sociopolitical challenges loom over the development of carbon removal. One is mitigation deterrence: that research and deployment of carbon removal could delay mitigation efforts. The other is environmental and climate justice — in particular that carbon removal will be developed in ways that further environmental racism, e.g. for the benefit of interests and groups in the global North while harming overburdened communities of color. A variety of policy measures have been proposed to deal with these challenges, from developing separate targets for emissions and removals to social safeguarding principles and standards. Here, we suggest that such measures in and of themselves are unlikely to be sufficient. Policy recommendations and scholarship on mitigation deterrence need to become more attentive to how racial capitalism helps form the conditions for mitigation deterrence. We describe how racial capitalism sets up mitigation deterrence, and how mitigation deterrence in turn goes on to perpetuate racial capitalism. We conclude by suggesting a few ways in which incorporating understandings of racial capitalism can help policymakers, carbon removal developers and investors make decisions that limit the risks of mitigation deterrence and racial injustice. • Racial capitalism is an important concept to understand for people thinking about carbon removal. • Racial capitalism enables mitigation deterrence from carbon removal through erasures in modelling and racialized labor formations. • Mitigation deterrence in turn goes on to perpetuate racial capitalism. • Environmental justice advocates have put forward ideas on addressing some mitigation deterrence risks from carbon removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103865
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial capitalism’s role in mitigation deterrence from carbon removal

Nils Markusson, Holly Jean Buck, Wim Carton
7 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.98
article

Racial capitalism’s role in mitigation deterrence from carbon removal

Nils Markusson, Holly Jean Buck, Wim Carton
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Two major sociopolitical challenges loom over the development of carbon removal. One is mitigation deterrence: that research and deployment of carbon removal could delay mitigation efforts. The other is environmental and climate justice — in particular that carbon removal will be developed in ways that further environmental racism, e.g. for the benefit of interests and groups in the global North while harming overburdened communities of color. A variety of policy measures have been proposed to deal with these challenges, from developing separate targets for emissions and removals to social safeguarding principles and standards. Here, we suggest that such measures in and of themselves are unlikely to be sufficient. Policy recommendations and scholarship on mitigation deterrence need to become more attentive to how racial capitalism helps form the conditions for mitigation deterrence. We describe how racial capitalism sets up mitigation deterrence, and how mitigation deterrence in turn goes on to perpetuate racial capitalism. We conclude by suggesting a few ways in which incorporating understandings of racial capitalism can help policymakers, carbon removal developers and investors make decisions that limit the risks of mitigation deterrence and racial injustice. • Racial capitalism is an important concept to understand for people thinking about carbon removal. • Racial capitalism enables mitigation deterrence from carbon removal through erasures in modelling and racialized labor formations. • Mitigation deterrence in turn goes on to perpetuate racial capitalism. • Environmental justice advocates have put forward ideas on addressing some mitigation deterrence risks from carbon removal.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 160
Lund University (SE), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Lancaster University (GB)
Skogs- och Jordbrukets Forskningsråd, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.