P24 Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of hypervirulent strains of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> of pig and human origin

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile places an increasing burden on healthcare because of emerging hypervirulent strains such as RT078/ST11 that may be resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics e.g. fluoroquinolones. Pigs are often colonized by RT078/ST11 and act as potential reservoir for human C. difficile infection (CDI). They are the highest consumers of veterinary antimicrobials in many countries.1 We investigated the susceptibility of C. difficile to antibiotics that are commonly prescribed and/or used to treat CDI. Methods Sequenced C. difficile (humans=50, pigs=40), collected as part of a One Health investigation into the epidemiology of pig and human C. difficile, were chosen for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Strains included ST11 (n=70), ST44 (n=9), ST16 (n=6), ST8 (n=5). Susceptibility to a panel of antibiotics were determined using ANAERO3 Sensititre™ plates and Etest®, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Selected C. difficile ST11 isolates (n=30) were tested for ciprofloxacin and delafloxacin susceptibility using Etest®. Breakpoints were interpreted as per EUCAST, CLSI and Freeman.2C. difficile genomes (n=90) were screened for AMR markers using NCBI AMRFinderPlus. Results Phenotypic testing found all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole, and to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxiclav, piperacillin/tazobactam, piperacillin, imipenem and chloramphenicol. Resistance was found to cefoxitin (100%), ceftriaxone (100%), erythromycin (48.94%), clindamycin (28.72%), moxifloxacin (48.94%), tetracycline (31.91%) and rifampicin (2.13%). All 30 ST11 isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, while the mean MIC for delafloxacin was 0.47 mg/L. There was no difference between resistance rate and C. difficile host. Bioinformatic analysis of 90 C. difficile genomes revealed resistance determinants for quinolones (87%) and tetracyclines (69%). Conclusions No resistance to vancomycin and metronidazole in these C. difficile isolates is reassuring, although larger datasets for surveillance should be investigated. Finding resistance determinants in the isolates in this study demonstrates that WGS is a valuable tool for detecting AMR. Quinolone and tetracycline resistance may be linked with use of these antibiotics on Irish pig farms (64.1% and 85.1% of farms, respectively).1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae136.028
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P24 Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of hypervirulent strains of Clostridioides difficile of pig and human origin

Aoife Doyle, Thomas R. Rogers, M. McElroy
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

P24 Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of hypervirulent strains of Clostridioides difficile of pig and human origin

Aoife Doyle, Thomas R. Rogers, M. McElroy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile places an increasing burden on healthcare because of emerging hypervirulent strains such as RT078/ST11 that may be resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics e.g. fluoroquinolones. Pigs are often colonized by RT078/ST11 and act as potential reservoir for human C. difficile infection (CDI). They are the highest consumers of veterinary antimicrobials in many countries.1 We investigated the susceptibility of C. difficile to antibiotics that are commonly prescribed and/or used to treat CDI. Methods Sequenced C. difficile (humans=50, pigs=40), collected as part of a One Health investigation into the epidemiology of pig and human C. difficile, were chosen for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Strains included ST11 (n=70), ST44 (n=9), ST16 (n=6), ST8 (n=5). Susceptibility to a panel of antibiotics were determined using ANAERO3 Sensititre™ plates and Etest®, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Selected C. difficile ST11 isolates (n=30) were tested for ciprofloxacin and delafloxacin susceptibility using Etest®. Breakpoints were interpreted as per EUCAST, CLSI and Freeman.2C. difficile genomes (n=90) were screened for AMR markers using NCBI AMRFinderPlus. Results Phenotypic testing found all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole, and to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxiclav, piperacillin/tazobactam, piperacillin, imipenem and chloramphenicol. Resistance was found to cefoxitin (100%), ceftriaxone (100%), erythromycin (48.94%), clindamycin (28.72%), moxifloxacin (48.94%), tetracycline (31.91%) and rifampicin (2.13%). All 30 ST11 isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, while the mean MIC for delafloxacin was 0.47 mg/L. There was no difference between resistance rate and C. difficile host. Bioinformatic analysis of 90 C. difficile genomes revealed resistance determinants for quinolones (87%) and tetracyclines (69%). Conclusions No resistance to vancomycin and metronidazole in these C. difficile isolates is reassuring, although larger datasets for surveillance should be investigated. Finding resistance determinants in the isolates in this study demonstrates that WGS is a valuable tool for detecting AMR. Quinolone and tetracycline resistance may be linked with use of these antibiotics on Irish pig farms (64.1% and 85.1% of farms, respectively).1

JAC-Antimicrobial ResistanceVol. 6(Supplement_2)
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.