Human Security, Multilateralism, and Solidarity

Abstract In 2022, the UN Development Programme ( UNDP ) released a Special Report on threats to human security in the Anthropocene, a year after UN Secretary-General António Guterres released his report Our Common Agenda . In anticipation of the 2024 Summit of the Future, both called for a reinvigoration of networked multilateralism and for solidarity to be adopted as a third human security pillar alongside protection and empowerment. This article explores those expectations against a deeper understanding of the UN history of human security and a cycle of declared concerns about human insecurity and precarity dating at least to UNDP ’s 1994 Human Development Report. It argues that there is little new in the “next-generation” model of networked multilateralism and that, as a global governance norm, solidarity for human security is underconceptualized and poorly operationalized. It points to the importance of reclaiming the local as a site of people-centered agency, care, and voice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-03002001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Security, Multilateralism, and Solidarity

Lorraine Elliott
2 citations
Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Global Security and Public Health
2.26
article

Human Security, Multilateralism, and Solidarity

Lorraine Elliott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In 2022, the UN Development Programme ( UNDP ) released a Special Report on threats to human security in the Anthropocene, a year after UN Secretary-General António Guterres released his report Our Common Agenda . In anticipation of the 2024 Summit of the Future, both called for a reinvigoration of networked multilateralism and for solidarity to be adopted as a third human security pillar alongside protection and empowerment. This article explores those expectations against a deeper understanding of the UN history of human security and a cycle of declared concerns about human insecurity and precarity dating at least to UNDP ’s 1994 Human Development Report. It argues that there is little new in the “next-generation” model of networked multilateralism and that, as a global governance norm, solidarity for human security is underconceptualized and poorly operationalized. It points to the importance of reclaiming the local as a site of people-centered agency, care, and voice.

Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International OrganizationsVol. 30(2)
Australian National University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global Security and Public Health
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.