O01 Antimicrobial resistance and death certification: are we there yet?

Abstract Background The impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on death at the patient level remains challenging to estimate. We aimed to characterize AMR-attributable deaths in a large UK centre through death certification. Methods This was a retrospective study of all patients who died in University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2022 (N=758). Clinical records of participants with positive microbiological samples within 28 days of death were reviewed by two independent investigators. AMR-attributable deaths were defined using a newly proposed standardized patient-level definition after consensus agreement between the two investigators. A third investigator acted as a tiebreaker in cases of disagreement. Results Overall, infection was the underlying cause of death for 11.7% (89/758) of participants and was implicated in the pathway that led to death in 41.1% (357/758) of cases. The most common infection syndromes leading to death as documented on the medical certificate of confirmation of death (MCCD) were respiratory tract infections, sepsis and COVID-19. In total, 4.2% (32/758) of all deaths were AMR-attributable. AMR-attributable deaths were more commonly recorded in patients admitted under haematology (7.5%, 9/120) and in younger patients (median age 67 versus 72, P=0.01). The median time from the index sample collection until death was 4.5 days (IQR 2–10.5 days). The majority of AMR-attributable deaths (56.3%, 18/32) were caused by treatment failure and subsequent treatment delay caused by intrinsic resistance mechanisms, primarily by Enterococcus faecium (38.9%, 7/18), Enterobacterales carrying repressed chromosomal AmpCs (27.7%, 5/18) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.2%, 4/18). On the contrary, a minority of AMR-attributable deaths (43.7%, 14/32) were caused by acquired resistance mechanisms, primarily derepressed AmpCs (28.6%, 4/14) and ESBLs (21.4%, 3/14). The median time to effective treatment was 32 h 15 min and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Only 62.5% (20/32) of AMR-attributable deaths as judged by study investigators had infection recorded on the MCCD. AMR was not recorded as a cause of death in any of the patients, including the 14 patients who were deemed to have suffered deaths due to acquired resistance by the study investigators. Conclusions Infection and AMR were significant causes of death in this cohort, yet there significantly underreported during death certification. In a low incidence setting for AMR, delays in treatment and AMR-attributable mortality due to intrinsic resistance mechanisms (expected phenotypes) were more common compared with acquired resistance mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae136.001
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O01 Antimicrobial resistance and death certification: are we there yet?

Louis Grandjean, Ioannis Baltas, Timothy M. Rawson, Gabriele Pollara et al.
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

O01 Antimicrobial resistance and death certification: are we there yet?

Louis Grandjean, Ioannis Baltas, Timothy M. Rawson, Gabriele Pollara, Hamish Houston
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on death at the patient level remains challenging to estimate. We aimed to characterize AMR-attributable deaths in a large UK centre through death certification. Methods This was a retrospective study of all patients who died in University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2022 (N=758). Clinical records of participants with positive microbiological samples within 28 days of death were reviewed by two independent investigators. AMR-attributable deaths were defined using a newly proposed standardized patient-level definition after consensus agreement between the two investigators. A third investigator acted as a tiebreaker in cases of disagreement. Results Overall, infection was the underlying cause of death for 11.7% (89/758) of participants and was implicated in the pathway that led to death in 41.1% (357/758) of cases. The most common infection syndromes leading to death as documented on the medical certificate of confirmation of death (MCCD) were respiratory tract infections, sepsis and COVID-19. In total, 4.2% (32/758) of all deaths were AMR-attributable. AMR-attributable deaths were more commonly recorded in patients admitted under haematology (7.5%, 9/120) and in younger patients (median age 67 versus 72, P=0.01). The median time from the index sample collection until death was 4.5 days (IQR 2–10.5 days). The majority of AMR-attributable deaths (56.3%, 18/32) were caused by treatment failure and subsequent treatment delay caused by intrinsic resistance mechanisms, primarily by Enterococcus faecium (38.9%, 7/18), Enterobacterales carrying repressed chromosomal AmpCs (27.7%, 5/18) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.2%, 4/18). On the contrary, a minority of AMR-attributable deaths (43.7%, 14/32) were caused by acquired resistance mechanisms, primarily derepressed AmpCs (28.6%, 4/14) and ESBLs (21.4%, 3/14). The median time to effective treatment was 32 h 15 min and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Only 62.5% (20/32) of AMR-attributable deaths as judged by study investigators had infection recorded on the MCCD. AMR was not recorded as a cause of death in any of the patients, including the 14 patients who were deemed to have suffered deaths due to acquired resistance by the study investigators. Conclusions Infection and AMR were significant causes of death in this cohort, yet there significantly underreported during death certification. In a low incidence setting for AMR, delays in treatment and AMR-attributable mortality due to intrinsic resistance mechanisms (expected phenotypes) were more common compared with acquired resistance mechanisms.

JAC-Antimicrobial ResistanceVol. 6(Supplement_2)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.