Enculturation-Acculturation Screening Tools for Empirical Aesthetics Research: a Proof of Principle Study

Abstract Grouping research participants by culture or language proficiency may no longer suffice to investigate cognitive universals and differences cross-culturally, due to the interconnectedness of our multicultural world. Based on immigration psychology research, we provide a ‘proof of principle’ for three culture screening tools. Across five online experiments (total N = 440), we developed (1) The Cultural Traditions Questionnaire ( CTQ ), (2) the Arts Engagement in Childhood Questionnaire ( AECQ ), and (3) the Enculturation and Acculturation Quiz ( EAQ ). While these screening tools are tailored to Iranian and English cultures, the procedures provided here are expandable to other cultures. The screening scores predicted emotional attachment to a culture better than traditional variables used in cross-cultural research (self-ascribed culture group, country of residence during formative years, mother tongue). Continuous measures of enculturation and acculturation are potentially better predictors for downstream variables of interest, due to their finer granularity and capability to capture multifaceted cultural identities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340192
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Art Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enculturation-Acculturation Screening Tools for Empirical Aesthetics Research: a Proof of Principle Study

Julia F. Christensen, Bilquis Castaño Manias, Shahrzad Khorsandi, Meghedi Vartanian et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Art Education and Development
6.49
article

Enculturation-Acculturation Screening Tools for Empirical Aesthetics Research: a Proof of Principle Study

Julia F. Christensen, Bilquis Castaño Manias, Shahrzad Khorsandi, Meghedi Vartanian, Klaus Frieler, Raha Golestani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Grouping research participants by culture or language proficiency may no longer suffice to investigate cognitive universals and differences cross-culturally, due to the interconnectedness of our multicultural world. Based on immigration psychology research, we provide a ‘proof of principle’ for three culture screening tools. Across five online experiments (total N = 440), we developed (1) The Cultural Traditions Questionnaire ( CTQ ), (2) the Arts Engagement in Childhood Questionnaire ( AECQ ), and (3) the Enculturation and Acculturation Quiz ( EAQ ). While these screening tools are tailored to Iranian and English cultures, the procedures provided here are expandable to other cultures. The screening scores predicted emotional attachment to a culture better than traditional variables used in cross-cultural research (self-ascribed culture group, country of residence during formative years, mother tongue). Continuous measures of enculturation and acculturation are potentially better predictors for downstream variables of interest, due to their finer granularity and capability to capture multifaceted cultural identities.

Journal of Cognition and CultureVol. 24(3-4)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
British Academy, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Friedrich Naumann Stiftung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Art Education and Development
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.