Evaluation of driving effects of carbon storage change in the source of the Yellow River: A perspective with CMIP6 future development scenarios

Understanding how future climate scenarios impact land use/cover (LUC) and carbon storage (CS) is crucial for achieving carbon neutrality. However, research often overlooks the spatiotemporal impacts of future climate and socioeconomic changes on CS. This study integrates system dynamic (SD), patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS), the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (InVEST) model, and the geographical detector to assess the LUC and CS evolution in the source of the Yellow River (SYR) from 2020 to 2060. Utilizing carbon density and LUC data, we explored the influence of natural and socioeconomic factors on CS under five shared socioeconomic pathways and representative concentration pathways (SSP-RCPs) scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) Ecological land, including woodland, grassland, and wetland, expanded more under SSP126 compared to SSP245, with SSP345, SSP460, and SSP585 showing a trend of degradation tied to deeper economic contribution. (2) By 2060, CS in terrestrial ecosystem under SSP126, SSP245, SSP345, SSP460, and SSP585 were 702.33 × 10 6 t, 700.33 × 10 6 t, 697.22 × 10 6 t, 696.03 × 10 6 t, and 691.21 × 10 6 t, respectively. This represents changes of 3.69 × 10 6 t, 1.69 × 10 6 t, −1.49 × 10 6 t, −2.68 × 10 6 t, and −7.43 × 10 6 t compared to 2020. (3) Soil type predominantly influenced the spatial differentiation of CS, with significant interactions with precipitation. This research provides new insights into land redistribution, economic strategies, and achieving carbon neutrality. • The carbon storage (CS) of SSP126 increases markedly from 2020 to 2060. • Soil organic carbon (SOC) constitutes the largest carbon pool. • Soil type and precipitation are the primary factors influencing the CS. • To enhance CS, it is essential to limit overconsumption of grasslands and water resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102790
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of driving effects of carbon storage change in the source of the Yellow River: A perspective with CMIP6 future development scenarios

Zihao Feng, Yanping Lan, Zizhen Chen, Haotian You et al.
11 citations
Ecological Informatics
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.22
article

Evaluation of driving effects of carbon storage change in the source of the Yellow River: A perspective with CMIP6 future development scenarios

Zihao Feng, Yanping Lan, Zizhen Chen, Haotian You, Jianjun Chen, Xiaowen Han, Xinhong Li, Ming Ling
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Understanding how future climate scenarios impact land use/cover (LUC) and carbon storage (CS) is crucial for achieving carbon neutrality. However, research often overlooks the spatiotemporal impacts of future climate and socioeconomic changes on CS. This study integrates system dynamic (SD), patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS), the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (InVEST) model, and the geographical detector to assess the LUC and CS evolution in the source of the Yellow River (SYR) from 2020 to 2060. Utilizing carbon density and LUC data, we explored the influence of natural and socioeconomic factors on CS under five shared socioeconomic pathways and representative concentration pathways (SSP-RCPs) scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) Ecological land, including woodland, grassland, and wetland, expanded more under SSP126 compared to SSP245, with SSP345, SSP460, and SSP585 showing a trend of degradation tied to deeper economic contribution. (2) By 2060, CS in terrestrial ecosystem under SSP126, SSP245, SSP345, SSP460, and SSP585 were 702.33 × 10 6 t, 700.33 × 10 6 t, 697.22 × 10 6 t, 696.03 × 10 6 t, and 691.21 × 10 6 t, respectively. This represents changes of 3.69 × 10 6 t, 1.69 × 10 6 t, −1.49 × 10 6 t, −2.68 × 10 6 t, and −7.43 × 10 6 t compared to 2020. (3) Soil type predominantly influenced the spatial differentiation of CS, with significant interactions with precipitation. This research provides new insights into land redistribution, economic strategies, and achieving carbon neutrality. • The carbon storage (CS) of SSP126 increases markedly from 2020 to 2060. • Soil organic carbon (SOC) constitutes the largest carbon pool. • Soil type and precipitation are the primary factors influencing the CS. • To enhance CS, it is essential to limit overconsumption of grasslands and water resources.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 83
Guilin University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.