On Subjectivity and Objectivity in the Semiotic Inquiry of Music

This article juxtaposes the subjective and the objective in the study of musical signification. It makes an attempt at a vicious core problem of notions that are general in their essence and prevalence. The interest is driven by general trends challenging the position of research in music, semiotics, and humanities. The problem persists, for instance, in Western art music (WAM), where the performer has the task of assessing the composer’s objectives and mediating them, but with a subjective interpretation, for the breadth of the audience to experience. The gist is that the juxtaposition is a false dichotomy, resolving to moderation, as the absolute objectiveness is mollified by fallibility of inquiry and the absolute subjectiveness by the shared embodied experience of the world. This is elaborated based on classical and current pragmatist conceptions of inquiry, semiosis, embodiment, hard and soft facts, and cognitive metaphors, addressing the body-mind and the body-social problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18290/rh247212sp.4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Subjectivity and Objectivity in the Semiotic Inquiry of Music

Juha Ojala
1 citations
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
0.51
article

On Subjectivity and Objectivity in the Semiotic Inquiry of Music

Juha Ojala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article juxtaposes the subjective and the objective in the study of musical signification. It makes an attempt at a vicious core problem of notions that are general in their essence and prevalence. The interest is driven by general trends challenging the position of research in music, semiotics, and humanities. The problem persists, for instance, in Western art music (WAM), where the performer has the task of assessing the composer’s objectives and mediating them, but with a subjective interpretation, for the breadth of the audience to experience. The gist is that the juxtaposition is a false dichotomy, resolving to moderation, as the absolute objectiveness is mollified by fallibility of inquiry and the absolute subjectiveness by the shared embodied experience of the world. This is elaborated based on classical and current pragmatist conceptions of inquiry, semiosis, embodiment, hard and soft facts, and cognitive metaphors, addressing the body-mind and the body-social problem.

Roczniki HumanistyczneVol. 72(12 Zeszyt specjalny)
University of the Arts Helsinki (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.