Industry 5.0, towards an enhanced built cultural heritage conservation practice

The rise of Industry 4.0 has led to a rapid increase in digitalization and industrial operations. However, it has recently been deemed insufficient in fulfilling European objectives for 2030. In response, and to counteract the unintended negative consequences triggered by Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0 has been introduced. The purpose of this article is to shed light on how the architecture, engineering, construction, management, operation, and conservation industry can adapt and better prepare to embrace novel Industry 5.0 principles and enabling technologies, ultimately resulting in enhanced conservation practices for the built cultural heritage environment. To achieve this, a systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. The principal results of this article highlight the work of different conservation professionals and our views on the potential of Industry 5.0 for enhancing conservation practices. Major conclusions indicate that artificial intelligence and digital twins are the two most studied technologies in the field. Sustainability is broadly discussed throughout the analyzed literature, whereas resilience and human centrism require further research and implementation efforts to achieve a holistic Industry 5.0 adoption. The significant scientific novelty of this work lies in the comprehensive scope of the review in terms of principles and enabling technologies, with a particular emphasis on heritage buildings. Thus, it is valuable for conservation practitioners seeking best practices, for policymakers as it suggests ways to encourage the adoption of novel technologies and principles in conservation, and for researchers as it highlights gaps and stimulates further paths of research and innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110542
Citations
26
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry 5.0, towards an enhanced built cultural heritage conservation practice

Rafael Ramírez Eudave, Vagelis Plevris, María Nogal, Alejandro Jiménez Ríos et al.
26 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
21.71
article

Industry 5.0, towards an enhanced built cultural heritage conservation practice

Rafael Ramírez Eudave, Vagelis Plevris, María Nogal, Alejandro Jiménez Ríos, Margarita L. Petrou
article en
26 citations

Abstract

The rise of Industry 4.0 has led to a rapid increase in digitalization and industrial operations. However, it has recently been deemed insufficient in fulfilling European objectives for 2030. In response, and to counteract the unintended negative consequences triggered by Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0 has been introduced. The purpose of this article is to shed light on how the architecture, engineering, construction, management, operation, and conservation industry can adapt and better prepare to embrace novel Industry 5.0 principles and enabling technologies, ultimately resulting in enhanced conservation practices for the built cultural heritage environment. To achieve this, a systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. The principal results of this article highlight the work of different conservation professionals and our views on the potential of Industry 5.0 for enhancing conservation practices. Major conclusions indicate that artificial intelligence and digital twins are the two most studied technologies in the field. Sustainability is broadly discussed throughout the analyzed literature, whereas resilience and human centrism require further research and implementation efforts to achieve a holistic Industry 5.0 adoption. The significant scientific novelty of this work lies in the comprehensive scope of the review in terms of principles and enabling technologies, with a particular emphasis on heritage buildings. Thus, it is valuable for conservation practitioners seeking best practices, for policymakers as it suggests ways to encourage the adoption of novel technologies and principles in conservation, and for researchers as it highlights gaps and stimulates further paths of research and innovation.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 96
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Cyprus (CY), University of Bath (GB), Qatar University (QA), Delft University of Technology (NL), University of Minho (PT)
Akershus University College of Applied Science, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
21.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.