Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production

Abstract Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDR) and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) have received a lot of attention as a tool to mitigate climate change and reach climate neutrality. Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is seen as one of the more promising CDRs, and from 2026, the Danish utility Ørsted is establishing the first BECCS plants in Denmark. We present a case study of BECCS by installing CCS at a biomass‐fired CHP plant and the aim is to quantify the CDR potential and carbon dynamics of the BECCS system. Moreover, the study aims to quantify the emissions related to capturing and store CO 2 . The GHG emissions from CCS including heat, electricity, transport and storage are approximately 100 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 and the carbon payback time of the BECCS system is 3–4 years relative to leaving the wood in the forest or at processing industries. The main driver of the payback time is the additional use of biomass to operate CCS which shifts the timing of CO 2 emissions more towards the present. The additional biomass use also increases supply chain emissions, and on top of that, only 90% of the direct CO 2 emissions from the CHP plant are captured. The study illustrates the importance of temporal scope in assessing the CDR potential of BECCS. With continuous use of biomass, GHG emissions are 207 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 in year 1 and −742 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 in year 99. This study reveals inconsistencies in the assessment of the CDR potential of BECCS in the literature. There is a considerable need for further research within this field to assess how BECCS can contribute to mitigating climate change and on the appropriate scale of BECCS deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13184
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production

Niclas Scott Bentsen, G. Weimann
8 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.70
article

Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production

Niclas Scott Bentsen, G. Weimann
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDR) and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) have received a lot of attention as a tool to mitigate climate change and reach climate neutrality. Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is seen as one of the more promising CDRs, and from 2026, the Danish utility Ørsted is establishing the first BECCS plants in Denmark. We present a case study of BECCS by installing CCS at a biomass‐fired CHP plant and the aim is to quantify the CDR potential and carbon dynamics of the BECCS system. Moreover, the study aims to quantify the emissions related to capturing and store CO 2 . The GHG emissions from CCS including heat, electricity, transport and storage are approximately 100 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 and the carbon payback time of the BECCS system is 3–4 years relative to leaving the wood in the forest or at processing industries. The main driver of the payback time is the additional use of biomass to operate CCS which shifts the timing of CO 2 emissions more towards the present. The additional biomass use also increases supply chain emissions, and on top of that, only 90% of the direct CO 2 emissions from the CHP plant are captured. The study illustrates the importance of temporal scope in assessing the CDR potential of BECCS. With continuous use of biomass, GHG emissions are 207 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 in year 1 and −742 kgCO 2 /t stored CO 2 in year 99. This study reveals inconsistencies in the assessment of the CDR potential of BECCS in the literature. There is a considerable need for further research within this field to assess how BECCS can contribute to mitigating climate change and on the appropriate scale of BECCS deployment.

GCB BioenergyVol. 16(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production — Niclas Scott Bentsen, G. Weimann · GCB Bioenergy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS