Review and modeling on hydrogen fuel cells electric vehicle (HFCEV), in comparison with battery electrical vehicle (BEV) using MATLAB environment. Case study: Postal car

• Building a MATLAB Simulink model to simulate an electric vehicle on a drive cycle. • Simulate tow cases: with battery capacity 75 kw, with hydrogen fuel cell capacity 75 kw. • Simulate tow dive cycle: proposed drive cycle, real drive cycle (NEDC). • Compare distance and power consumption in both. • The future is in favor of hydrogen fuel cells rather than lithium batteries, despite the fact that the later are still feasible now. This research puts forward the modeling of a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (HFCEV) and its validation, in comparison with battery electrical vehicle (BEV) based on a postal vehicle and its subsystems. The main investigation parameters are the amount of hydrogen consumed, and the change in the state of charging of the battery. For the profile of the same speed route, an HFCEV model and a BEV model, consisting of multiple subsystems, were developed, and simulated in the MATLAB® Simulink environment. We make use of various sources of drive cycles to obtain our outcomes such as the New European Diving Cycle (NEDC). By running simulations for different stages, we are able to generate simulation results. The discrepancies in the graphs and the visual demonstrations guided us to variable conclusions on how different factors affect an electric vehicle’s performance and efficiency. The simulation result shows that the (BEV) is 30% more effective for NEDC drive cycle comparing with (HFCEV).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100684
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review and modeling on hydrogen fuel cells electric vehicle (HFCEV), in comparison with battery electrical vehicle (BEV) using MATLAB environment. Case study: Postal car

J. Chyský, Ghaeth Fandi, Jaroslav Novák, Jakub Šrom
16 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
3.25
article

Review and modeling on hydrogen fuel cells electric vehicle (HFCEV), in comparison with battery electrical vehicle (BEV) using MATLAB environment. Case study: Postal car

J. Chyský, Ghaeth Fandi, Jaroslav Novák, Jakub Šrom
article en
16 citations

Abstract

• Building a MATLAB Simulink model to simulate an electric vehicle on a drive cycle. • Simulate tow cases: with battery capacity 75 kw, with hydrogen fuel cell capacity 75 kw. • Simulate tow dive cycle: proposed drive cycle, real drive cycle (NEDC). • Compare distance and power consumption in both. • The future is in favor of hydrogen fuel cells rather than lithium batteries, despite the fact that the later are still feasible now. This research puts forward the modeling of a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (HFCEV) and its validation, in comparison with battery electrical vehicle (BEV) based on a postal vehicle and its subsystems. The main investigation parameters are the amount of hydrogen consumed, and the change in the state of charging of the battery. For the profile of the same speed route, an HFCEV model and a BEV model, consisting of multiple subsystems, were developed, and simulated in the MATLAB® Simulink environment. We make use of various sources of drive cycles to obtain our outcomes such as the New European Diving Cycle (NEDC). By running simulations for different stages, we are able to generate simulation results. The discrepancies in the graphs and the visual demonstrations guided us to variable conclusions on how different factors affect an electric vehicle’s performance and efficiency. The simulation result shows that the (BEV) is 30% more effective for NEDC drive cycle comparing with (HFCEV).

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 24
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.