The performance of AlphaMissense to identify genes influencing disease

A novel algorithm, AlphaMissense, has been shown to have an improved ability to predict the pathogenicity of rare missense genetic variants. However, it is not known whether AlphaMissense improves the ability of gene-based testing to identify disease-influencing genes. Using whole-exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank, we compared gene-based association analysis strategies including sets of deleterious variants: predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) variants only, pLoF plus AlphaMissense pathogenic variants, pLoF with missense variants predicted to be deleterious by any of five commonly utilized annotation methods (Missense (1/5)) or only variants predicted to be deleterious by all five methods (Missense (5/5)). We measured performance to identify 519 previously identified positive control genes, which can lead to Mendelian diseases, or are the targets of successfully developed medicines. These strategies identified 0.85 million pLoF variants and 5 million deleterious missense variants, including 22,131 likely pathogenic missense variants identified exclusively by AlphaMissense. The gene-based association tests found 608 significant gene associations (at p < 1.25 × 10<sup>-7</sup>) across 24 common traits and diseases. Compared with pLoFs plus Missense (5/5), tests using pLoFs and AlphaMissense variants found slightly more significant gene-disease and gene-trait associations, albeit with a marginally lower proportion of positive control genes. Nevertheless, their overall performance was similar. Merging AlphaMissense with Missense (5/5), whether through their intersection or union, did not yield any further enhancement in performance. In summary, employing AlphaMissense to select deleterious variants for gene-based testing did not improve the ability to identify genes that are known to influence disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100344
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The performance of AlphaMissense to identify genes influencing disease

Celia M.T. Greenwood, Kevin Y. H. Liang, Takayoshi Sasako, J. Brent Richards et al.
2 citations
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
Genomics and Rare Diseases
1.10
article

The performance of AlphaMissense to identify genes influencing disease

Celia M.T. Greenwood, Kevin Y. H. Liang, Takayoshi Sasako, J. Brent Richards, Summaira Yasmeen, Claudia Langenberg, Guillaume Butler‐Laporte, Yann Ilboudo, Yiheng Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A novel algorithm, AlphaMissense, has been shown to have an improved ability to predict the pathogenicity of rare missense genetic variants. However, it is not known whether AlphaMissense improves the ability of gene-based testing to identify disease-influencing genes. Using whole-exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank, we compared gene-based association analysis strategies including sets of deleterious variants: predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) variants only, pLoF plus AlphaMissense pathogenic variants, pLoF with missense variants predicted to be deleterious by any of five commonly utilized annotation methods (Missense (1/5)) or only variants predicted to be deleterious by all five methods (Missense (5/5)). We measured performance to identify 519 previously identified positive control genes, which can lead to Mendelian diseases, or are the targets of successfully developed medicines. These strategies identified 0.85 million pLoF variants and 5 million deleterious missense variants, including 22,131 likely pathogenic missense variants identified exclusively by AlphaMissense. The gene-based association tests found 608 significant gene associations (at p < 1.25 × 10<sup>-7</sup>) across 24 common traits and diseases. Compared with pLoFs plus Missense (5/5), tests using pLoFs and AlphaMissense variants found slightly more significant gene-disease and gene-trait associations, albeit with a marginally lower proportion of positive control genes. Nevertheless, their overall performance was similar. Merging AlphaMissense with Missense (5/5), whether through their intersection or union, did not yield any further enhancement in performance. In summary, employing AlphaMissense to select deleterious variants for gene-based testing did not improve the ability to identify genes that are known to influence disease.

Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesVol. 5(4)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), McGill University (CA), The University of Tokyo (JP)
TD Bank, McGill University, Wellcome Trust, Public Health Agency of Canada, Compute Canada, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, King's College London, European Commission, Public Health Agency, Jewish General Hospital, Fondation de l'Hôpital général juif, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé, Medical Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.