Same bed, different nightmares: strategic divergence in the Australia-New Zealand alliance

Despite the consistently positive rhetoric surrounding the Trans-Tasman alliance, this article identifies three trends contributing to a growing strategic divergence in the relationship that threaten its very viability. First, Australia's engagement with numerous new security groupings over the past decade has diminished the relative importance of its ties with New Zealand. Second, the ‘strategic personalities' of these antipodean allies are diverging, driven by a widening gap in their defence expenditures and increasingly distinct strategic relationships with the United States. Third, the article highlights how Canberra and New Zealand have embraced different visions for Asia’s strategic future, reflecting and exacerbating their divergence. The article concludes with policy recommendations aimed at understanding and addressing the deepening drift in Trans-Tasman strategic relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal Of International Affairs
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2391335
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Same bed, different nightmares: strategic divergence in the Australia-New Zealand alliance

Brendan Taylor
Australian Journal Of International Affairs
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Same bed, different nightmares: strategic divergence in the Australia-New Zealand alliance

Brendan Taylor
article en

Abstract

Despite the consistently positive rhetoric surrounding the Trans-Tasman alliance, this article identifies three trends contributing to a growing strategic divergence in the relationship that threaten its very viability. First, Australia's engagement with numerous new security groupings over the past decade has diminished the relative importance of its ties with New Zealand. Second, the ‘strategic personalities' of these antipodean allies are diverging, driven by a widening gap in their defence expenditures and increasingly distinct strategic relationships with the United States. Third, the article highlights how Canberra and New Zealand have embraced different visions for Asia’s strategic future, reflecting and exacerbating their divergence. The article concludes with policy recommendations aimed at understanding and addressing the deepening drift in Trans-Tasman strategic relations.

Australian Journal Of International AffairsVol. 78(5)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.