Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation

We compare public perceptions of restoring different ecosystems to increase CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in Germany, through focus groups and a general population survey. Among focus group participants forests were highly popular, peatlands evoked negative associations, and seagrass was largely unknown. Nevertheless, the restoration of all ecosystems was viewed positively. We contrast these reactions to those of survey respondents who had not received additional information on restoration. They voiced narrower, less diverse opinions centering around afforestation. Further, focus group participants preferred expert-led restoration decisions, citing low trust in politicians' technical competence. Contrary to common policy recommendations, also beyond the German context, participants did not emphasize the need of citizen participation and were not strongly concerned about land use conflicts or compensation of affected user groups. The results imply that the public underestimates the political complexity of negotiation processes in ecosystem governance, which are becoming increasingly relevant in the international policy landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02063-y
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation

Christine Merk, Andrea Wunsch, Annegret Kuhn
5 citations
AMBIO
Marine and coastal plant biology
2.40
article

Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation

Christine Merk, Andrea Wunsch, Annegret Kuhn
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We compare public perceptions of restoring different ecosystems to increase CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in Germany, through focus groups and a general population survey. Among focus group participants forests were highly popular, peatlands evoked negative associations, and seagrass was largely unknown. Nevertheless, the restoration of all ecosystems was viewed positively. We contrast these reactions to those of survey respondents who had not received additional information on restoration. They voiced narrower, less diverse opinions centering around afforestation. Further, focus group participants preferred expert-led restoration decisions, citing low trust in politicians' technical competence. Contrary to common policy recommendations, also beyond the German context, participants did not emphasize the need of citizen participation and were not strongly concerned about land use conflicts or compensation of affected user groups. The results imply that the public underestimates the political complexity of negotiation processes in ecosystem governance, which are becoming increasingly relevant in the international policy landscape.

AMBIOVol. 54(1)
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Marine and coastal plant biology
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.