Sour, but acceptable: Taste responsiveness to five food-associated acids in zoo-housed white-faced sakis, Pithecia pithecia

White-faced sakis (Pithecia pithecia) are commonly considered as frugivores but are unusual among primates as they do not specialize on ripe fruits but rather include a high proportion of unripe fruits into their diet, even during seasons when ripe fruits are available. Using a two-bottle preference test of short duration we therefore assessed whether this dietary specialization affects the taste responsiveness and sour-taste tolerance of four adult white-faced sakis for five food-associated acids. We found taste preference thresholds of the sakis to be 1-10 mM for citric acid, 0.5-20 mM for ascorbic acid, 2-10 mM for malic acid, 0.1-1 mM for tannic acid, and 2-20 mM for acetic acid, respectively. When given the choice between a reference solution of 50 mM sucrose and mixtures containing varying concentrations of sucrose plus citric acid, the sakis displayed a high sour-taste tolerance and required only 100 mM of sucrose (when mixed with 10 mM citric acid) or 200 mM of sucrose (when mixed with 30 or 50 mM citric acid), respectively, to prefer the sweet-sour mixture over the purely sweet 50 mM sucrose reference solution. These results demonstrate that white-faced sakis have a well-developed taste sensitivity for food-associated acids which is not inferior to that of primates specializing on ripe fruits. Compared to other platyrrhine primates, the sakis displayed a markedly higher sour-taste tolerance. These results may therefore reflect an evolutionary adaptation to the dietary specialization of the white-faced sakis to sour-tasting unripe fruits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiology & Behavior
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114679
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sour, but acceptable: Taste responsiveness to five food-associated acids in zoo-housed white-faced sakis, Pithecia pithecia

Matthias Laska, Emma Pulkkinen, Ida Fischer
2 citations
Physiology & Behavior
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
0.62
article

Sour, but acceptable: Taste responsiveness to five food-associated acids in zoo-housed white-faced sakis, Pithecia pithecia

Matthias Laska, Emma Pulkkinen, Ida Fischer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

White-faced sakis (Pithecia pithecia) are commonly considered as frugivores but are unusual among primates as they do not specialize on ripe fruits but rather include a high proportion of unripe fruits into their diet, even during seasons when ripe fruits are available. Using a two-bottle preference test of short duration we therefore assessed whether this dietary specialization affects the taste responsiveness and sour-taste tolerance of four adult white-faced sakis for five food-associated acids. We found taste preference thresholds of the sakis to be 1-10 mM for citric acid, 0.5-20 mM for ascorbic acid, 2-10 mM for malic acid, 0.1-1 mM for tannic acid, and 2-20 mM for acetic acid, respectively. When given the choice between a reference solution of 50 mM sucrose and mixtures containing varying concentrations of sucrose plus citric acid, the sakis displayed a high sour-taste tolerance and required only 100 mM of sucrose (when mixed with 10 mM citric acid) or 200 mM of sucrose (when mixed with 30 or 50 mM citric acid), respectively, to prefer the sweet-sour mixture over the purely sweet 50 mM sucrose reference solution. These results demonstrate that white-faced sakis have a well-developed taste sensitivity for food-associated acids which is not inferior to that of primates specializing on ripe fruits. Compared to other platyrrhine primates, the sakis displayed a markedly higher sour-taste tolerance. These results may therefore reflect an evolutionary adaptation to the dietary specialization of the white-faced sakis to sour-tasting unripe fruits.

Physiology & BehaviorVol. 286
Linköping University (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
0.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.