Teaching for Successful Intelligence

This study aims to modify the score of English teachers' abilities in teaching successful intelligence in Jeddah and discover the differences in teaching for successful intelligence in light of some demographical variables such as: (teachers' years of experience; gender; teaching classes; and types of educational study). A quantitative approach was implemented using the questionnaire "Teaching for Successful Intelligence" by Palos and Maricutoiu (2013). The participants are 123 English teachers working in governmental schools in Jeddah. The findings indicate that the total degree of the teachers' preferences for teaching styles relevant to stimulating the students' successful intelligence abilities is an acceptable degree (M=3.74). Creative teaching style has the highest degree (M=3.85), and the analytical teaching style has the lowest degree (M=3.64). No statically differences were found in TSI according to years of experience, but there are statically differences in TSI according to gender in favor of females in all dimensions and in the total degree except CT the differences come in favor of males. Based on classes per week of teaching, there are no statically differences in some of TSI except RT in favor of teachers who teach less than 10 classes and AT comes in favor of teachers who teach more than 20 classes per week. Also, there are no statically differences in TCI according to their educational study except in RT there is a statistical difference between groups in favor of teachers whose educational study was sequential study. Researchers recommend taking care of the pre-service phase and in-service teachers' training as well should inserting the new competencies of teachers in the light of the 2030 Saudi vision.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33193/jalhss.111.2024.1209
Citations
140
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching for Successful Intelligence

140 citations
Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
3.22
article

Teaching for Successful Intelligence

article en
140 citations

Abstract

This study aims to modify the score of English teachers' abilities in teaching successful intelligence in Jeddah and discover the differences in teaching for successful intelligence in light of some demographical variables such as: (teachers' years of experience; gender; teaching classes; and types of educational study). A quantitative approach was implemented using the questionnaire "Teaching for Successful Intelligence" by Palos and Maricutoiu (2013). The participants are 123 English teachers working in governmental schools in Jeddah. The findings indicate that the total degree of the teachers' preferences for teaching styles relevant to stimulating the students' successful intelligence abilities is an acceptable degree (M=3.74). Creative teaching style has the highest degree (M=3.85), and the analytical teaching style has the lowest degree (M=3.64). No statically differences were found in TSI according to years of experience, but there are statically differences in TSI according to gender in favor of females in all dimensions and in the total degree except CT the differences come in favor of males. Based on classes per week of teaching, there are no statically differences in some of TSI except RT in favor of teachers who teach less than 10 classes and AT comes in favor of teachers who teach more than 20 classes per week. Also, there are no statically differences in TCI according to their educational study except in RT there is a statistical difference between groups in favor of teachers whose educational study was sequential study. Researchers recommend taking care of the pre-service phase and in-service teachers' training as well should inserting the new competencies of teachers in the light of the 2030 Saudi vision.

Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 111
Expert System (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.