Study on the reaction mechanism and kinetics of limestone hydrogenation by micro fluidized bed: Effect of H2 concentration and natural limestone

Limestone decomposition is the first step in cement production, which produces a significant amount of CO 2 and poses a significant challenge to achieve carbon neutrality. Hydrogenation of limestone can produce CO or CH 4 instead of CO 2 , which can be considered as a new way of carbon capture, making it a promising method for carbon emission reduction. In this work, pure CaCO 3 and several natural limestone samples were hydrolyzed under varying H 2 concentration using a micro fluidized bed (MFB) reactor combined with online mass spectrometry to reveal the mechanism and kinetics of limestone hydrogenation. The main gases produced by hydrogenation at 1 atm are CO and CO 2 . The CO 2 comes from the calcination of CaCO 3 . The CO comes from 2 steps: the first step is the in-situ hydrogenation of CaCO 3 and the second step is the Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) reaction. The activation energy (Ea) of CO 2 formation in H 2 atmosphere is lower than in Ar atmosphere. However, there is no obvious effect of different H 2 concentrations on the Ea of CO 2 formation. The Ea of CO in situ formation is 72.70 KJ/mol, 54.53 KJ/mol, 71.34 KJ/mol and 60.29 KJ/mol in 10%, 30%, 50% and 70% H 2 atmosphere, respectively. The H 2 concentration also has no significant effect on the in-situ CO evolution. However, the H 2 concentration can affect the Ea of CO produced by RWGS. The Ea is 75.67 KJ/mol, 167.59 KJ/mol and 221.47 KJ/mol in 10%, 30% and 50% H 2 atmosphere, and this reaction doesn't occur in 70% H 2 atmosphere. Compared with the pure CaCO 3 , the hydrogenation of limestone can produce more CO and less CO 2 . In limestone, impurity elements are the main factor affecting the reaction kinetics. Transition metals can increase the rate of CO 2 production, but have no apparent effect on CO. The CO 2 yield of high impurity limestone is higher than that of limestone with low impurities. Transition metals can also reduce the Ea of CO 2 formation and the RWGS reaction. In the 50% H 2 atmosphere, the Ea of CO 2 formation is 88.87 KJ/mol and the Ea of CO from RWGS is 137.60 KJ/mol. However, under the same conditions, the Ea of pure CaCO 3 is 126.91 KJ/mol and 221.47 KJ/mol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100271
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the reaction mechanism and kinetics of limestone hydrogenation by micro fluidized bed: Effect of H2 concentration and natural limestone

Yingquan Chen, Yang Yang, Hengrui Jin, Xianhua Wang et al.
1 citations
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
0.18
article

Study on the reaction mechanism and kinetics of limestone hydrogenation by micro fluidized bed: Effect of H2 concentration and natural limestone

Yingquan Chen, Yang Yang, Hengrui Jin, Xianhua Wang, Haiping Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Limestone decomposition is the first step in cement production, which produces a significant amount of CO 2 and poses a significant challenge to achieve carbon neutrality. Hydrogenation of limestone can produce CO or CH 4 instead of CO 2 , which can be considered as a new way of carbon capture, making it a promising method for carbon emission reduction. In this work, pure CaCO 3 and several natural limestone samples were hydrolyzed under varying H 2 concentration using a micro fluidized bed (MFB) reactor combined with online mass spectrometry to reveal the mechanism and kinetics of limestone hydrogenation. The main gases produced by hydrogenation at 1 atm are CO and CO 2 . The CO 2 comes from the calcination of CaCO 3 . The CO comes from 2 steps: the first step is the in-situ hydrogenation of CaCO 3 and the second step is the Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) reaction. The activation energy (Ea) of CO 2 formation in H 2 atmosphere is lower than in Ar atmosphere. However, there is no obvious effect of different H 2 concentrations on the Ea of CO 2 formation. The Ea of CO in situ formation is 72.70 KJ/mol, 54.53 KJ/mol, 71.34 KJ/mol and 60.29 KJ/mol in 10%, 30%, 50% and 70% H 2 atmosphere, respectively. The H 2 concentration also has no significant effect on the in-situ CO evolution. However, the H 2 concentration can affect the Ea of CO produced by RWGS. The Ea is 75.67 KJ/mol, 167.59 KJ/mol and 221.47 KJ/mol in 10%, 30% and 50% H 2 atmosphere, and this reaction doesn't occur in 70% H 2 atmosphere. Compared with the pure CaCO 3 , the hydrogenation of limestone can produce more CO and less CO 2 . In limestone, impurity elements are the main factor affecting the reaction kinetics. Transition metals can increase the rate of CO 2 production, but have no apparent effect on CO. The CO 2 yield of high impurity limestone is higher than that of limestone with low impurities. Transition metals can also reduce the Ea of CO 2 formation and the RWGS reaction. In the 50% H 2 atmosphere, the Ea of CO 2 formation is 88.87 KJ/mol and the Ea of CO from RWGS is 137.60 KJ/mol. However, under the same conditions, the Ea of pure CaCO 3 is 126.91 KJ/mol and 221.47 KJ/mol.

Carbon Capture Science & TechnologyVol. 13
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.