Language injustice and social equity in EMI policies in China

This paper explores the issue of language injustice in implementing English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in China, with a focus on social justice and language ideologies. In China, EMI is seen as crucial for developing globally competitive students. However, most EMI policies advocate for English-only instruction, disregarding the multilingual realities of China. This leads to deviations from teaching objectives and potential injustices for both teachers and students. This paper reviews EMI policies since 2001, highlighting the absence of detailed national guidelines, which results in schools adapting EMI to their specific circumstances. English-only policies may exacerbate educational inequalities, making it challenging for rural and public school students to meet EMI's English language requirements, thus impeding access to quality education. This paper advocates for a more inclusive EMI approach that acknowledges and utilizes multilingual resources to promote social justice, ensuring all students have equal access to academic knowledge. Additionally, the paper suggests future research should examine how EMI policymakers and stakeholders perceive multilingualism and its impacts on social justice in classrooms and society at large.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Region - Educational Research and Reviews
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v6i7.2407
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language injustice and social equity in EMI policies in China

Zhiyi ZHU
Region - Educational Research and Reviews
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Language injustice and social equity in EMI policies in China

Zhiyi ZHU
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the issue of language injustice in implementing English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in China, with a focus on social justice and language ideologies. In China, EMI is seen as crucial for developing globally competitive students. However, most EMI policies advocate for English-only instruction, disregarding the multilingual realities of China. This leads to deviations from teaching objectives and potential injustices for both teachers and students. This paper reviews EMI policies since 2001, highlighting the absence of detailed national guidelines, which results in schools adapting EMI to their specific circumstances. English-only policies may exacerbate educational inequalities, making it challenging for rural and public school students to meet EMI's English language requirements, thus impeding access to quality education. This paper advocates for a more inclusive EMI approach that acknowledges and utilizes multilingual resources to promote social justice, ensuring all students have equal access to academic knowledge. Additionally, the paper suggests future research should examine how EMI policymakers and stakeholders perceive multilingualism and its impacts on social justice in classrooms and society at large.

Region - Educational Research and ReviewsVol. 6(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.