Filling the gaps in soil data: A multi-model framework for addressing data gaps using pedotransfer functions and machine-learning with uncertainty estimates to estimate bulk density

• 512 pedotransfer functions were developed using the machine learner Random Forest. • 27 models were used to estimate bulk density values missing from the dataset. • These models had concordance correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.92. • Quantile regression provides uncertainty estimates of pedotransfer functions. Legacy soil datasets are a valuable resource and should be used to the greatest extent possible. However, such datasets may be incomplete, and lack observations for every attribute, as the dataset may be compiled from multiple studies. To use these datasets in soil mapping and modeling work, it is useful to fill the gaps in the dataset with estimated values. Machine learning is an approach that can provide estimates with high accuracy. In this study, the machine learner Random Forest (RF) was used to estimate bulk density values in an existing dataset from the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, which was used as a case study dataset. As the dataset had missing observations across all attributes, multiple models needed to be generated and tested to determine the accuracy of the estimated values produced. A total of 512 models were tested using RF, which were then ranked based on the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of their estimates; the CCC of all models ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. The estimates of 27 of these models were then used to fill the missing observations in the dataset; the accuracy of these models ranged from a CCC of 0.63 to 0.92. Further, uncertainty estimates for the predictions were generated using quantile regression, which was coupled with the RF approach. Each model tested therefore had an accuracy measurement and an uncertainty estimate. This approach, of using multiple models developed in RF, can be applied to other legacy soil datasets with inconsistently missing values to produce estimates which can fill the missing observations, and produce uncertainty estimates for those estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108310
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filling the gaps in soil data: A multi-model framework for addressing data gaps using pedotransfer functions and machine-learning with uncertainty estimates to estimate bulk density

Sean Smukler, Babak Kasraei, Deepa Filatow, Margaret Schmidt et al.
6 citations
CATENA
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.57
article

Filling the gaps in soil data: A multi-model framework for addressing data gaps using pedotransfer functions and machine-learning with uncertainty estimates to estimate bulk density

Sean Smukler, Babak Kasraei, Deepa Filatow, Margaret Schmidt, Brandon Heung, Chuck Bulmer, Adrienne Arbor, Jin Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• 512 pedotransfer functions were developed using the machine learner Random Forest. • 27 models were used to estimate bulk density values missing from the dataset. • These models had concordance correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.92. • Quantile regression provides uncertainty estimates of pedotransfer functions. Legacy soil datasets are a valuable resource and should be used to the greatest extent possible. However, such datasets may be incomplete, and lack observations for every attribute, as the dataset may be compiled from multiple studies. To use these datasets in soil mapping and modeling work, it is useful to fill the gaps in the dataset with estimated values. Machine learning is an approach that can provide estimates with high accuracy. In this study, the machine learner Random Forest (RF) was used to estimate bulk density values in an existing dataset from the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, which was used as a case study dataset. As the dataset had missing observations across all attributes, multiple models needed to be generated and tested to determine the accuracy of the estimated values produced. A total of 512 models were tested using RF, which were then ranked based on the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of their estimates; the CCC of all models ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. The estimates of 27 of these models were then used to fill the missing observations in the dataset; the accuracy of these models ranged from a CCC of 0.63 to 0.92. Further, uncertainty estimates for the predictions were generated using quantile regression, which was coupled with the RF approach. Each model tested therefore had an accuracy measurement and an uncertainty estimate. This approach, of using multiple models developed in RF, can be applied to other legacy soil datasets with inconsistently missing values to produce estimates which can fill the missing observations, and produce uncertainty estimates for those estimates.

CATENAVol. 245
Dalhousie University (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), Government of British Columbia (CA), Ministry of Forests (CA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.