Life satisfaction, consumption adequacy and social comparison in social deprivation environments

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the influence of relative social standing, society’s level of restrictions and consumption adequacy on life satisfaction as well as to examine the moderating effect that an environment of social deprivations can cause in this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses data from 23,152 individuals distributed in 272 regions of 18 developing countries collected from the World Values Survey (WVS). Given the hierarchical structure nature of the data in a cross-country setting, the paper utilizes a multilevel linear mixed-effects model with cross-level interaction. Findings The results show that social deprivation, perception of inadequate consumption and lower social standing negatively affect life satisfaction. Likewise, social comparison and consumption adequacy are moderated by the level of social deprivation, showing that the effect of these variables on life satisfaction is more pronounced for individuals living in regions with a higher level of deprivation than for those living in more affluent societies. Originality/value This study enhances the comprehension of well-being within contexts characterized by elevated levels of social deprivation. Furthermore, it provides evidence that objective and subjective deprivations are not independent and antithetical concepts but act mutually in reducing individual well-being. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-08-2023-0623

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Economics
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-08-2023-0623
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life satisfaction, consumption adequacy and social comparison in social deprivation environments

Thiago Matheus De Paula, Verónica Peñaloza
1 citations
International Journal of Social Economics
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
0.64
article

Life satisfaction, consumption adequacy and social comparison in social deprivation environments

Thiago Matheus De Paula, Verónica Peñaloza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the influence of relative social standing, society’s level of restrictions and consumption adequacy on life satisfaction as well as to examine the moderating effect that an environment of social deprivations can cause in this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses data from 23,152 individuals distributed in 272 regions of 18 developing countries collected from the World Values Survey (WVS). Given the hierarchical structure nature of the data in a cross-country setting, the paper utilizes a multilevel linear mixed-effects model with cross-level interaction. Findings The results show that social deprivation, perception of inadequate consumption and lower social standing negatively affect life satisfaction. Likewise, social comparison and consumption adequacy are moderated by the level of social deprivation, showing that the effect of these variables on life satisfaction is more pronounced for individuals living in regions with a higher level of deprivation than for those living in more affluent societies. Originality/value This study enhances the comprehension of well-being within contexts characterized by elevated levels of social deprivation. Furthermore, it provides evidence that objective and subjective deprivations are not independent and antithetical concepts but act mutually in reducing individual well-being. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-08-2023-0623

International Journal of Social EconomicsVol. 52(6)
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.