Information problem solving during a digital authentic task: A thematic analysis of students’ strategies

In the digital age, information problem solving (IPS) competence is essential for professionals to use online information effectively. Despite its importance, starting professionals often struggle with processing and presenting information, which are critical phases during authentic IPS tasks. Therefore, higher education institutions are tasked with preparing students to navigate these complex phases of IPS after graduation. However, most previous studies have focused on the “search” and “select” phases of simple, short-duration IPS tasks, which do not reflect the complex information challenges faced in professional settings. To address this gap, this study aimed to identify and categorize the strategies higher education students currently use to process and present information for a semester-long authentic professional task. A thematic analysis of cued retrospective reporting sessions was conducted with 24 senior students while they created a website for professional practice. Students demonstrated 49 IPS strategies, which were categorized into twelve IPS activities across three generic activity phases: “process,” “synthesize,” and “create.” Within these phases, three patterns of co-occurring strategies were observed: reproductive, arranging, and elaborative. Based on these findings, existing IPS process models were empirically refined. The observed variation in strategies highlights the importance of building on students' strengths when teaching IPS. Teaching them to adapt the strategies to various authentic task contexts could help enhance students’ IPS competence and strategic flexibility in real-world settings. Future research should explore the applicability of the updated IPS model across different authentic task contexts to refine instructional approaches further. • Fifty information problem solving strategies in authentic tasks identified. • Strategies categorized across three activity phases: process, synthesize, create. • Three strategic patterns classified: reproductive, arranging, and elaborative. • Instructional guidance needed to enhance deeper information processing. • Teaching strategic flexibility key in information problem solving education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100470
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information problem solving during a digital authentic task: A thematic analysis of students’ strategies

Stan van Ginkel, Matthijs Smakman, Erik Barendsen, Johan Versendaal et al.
3 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
2.37
article

Information problem solving during a digital authentic task: A thematic analysis of students’ strategies

Stan van Ginkel, Matthijs Smakman, Erik Barendsen, Johan Versendaal, Josien Boetje
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the digital age, information problem solving (IPS) competence is essential for professionals to use online information effectively. Despite its importance, starting professionals often struggle with processing and presenting information, which are critical phases during authentic IPS tasks. Therefore, higher education institutions are tasked with preparing students to navigate these complex phases of IPS after graduation. However, most previous studies have focused on the “search” and “select” phases of simple, short-duration IPS tasks, which do not reflect the complex information challenges faced in professional settings. To address this gap, this study aimed to identify and categorize the strategies higher education students currently use to process and present information for a semester-long authentic professional task. A thematic analysis of cued retrospective reporting sessions was conducted with 24 senior students while they created a website for professional practice. Students demonstrated 49 IPS strategies, which were categorized into twelve IPS activities across three generic activity phases: “process,” “synthesize,” and “create.” Within these phases, three patterns of co-occurring strategies were observed: reproductive, arranging, and elaborative. Based on these findings, existing IPS process models were empirically refined. The observed variation in strategies highlights the importance of building on students' strengths when teaching IPS. Teaching them to adapt the strategies to various authentic task contexts could help enhance students’ IPS competence and strategic flexibility in real-world settings. Future research should explore the applicability of the updated IPS model across different authentic task contexts to refine instructional approaches further. • Fifty information problem solving strategies in authentic tasks identified. • Strategies categorized across three activity phases: process, synthesize, create. • Three strategic patterns classified: reproductive, arranging, and elaborative. • Instructional guidance needed to enhance deeper information processing. • Teaching strategic flexibility key in information problem solving education.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 15
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Living Systems (United States) (US), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.