Two-Decade Retrospective Analysis of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Spain and Mexico: A Comprehensive Study

<b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) in Spain and Mexico, focusing on microbial patterns, antibiotic resistance, infection sources, risk factors, and patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Over 20 years, 705 endophthalmitis cases were reviewed, and we identified 78 cases of EE in Santiago de Compostela, Spain, and Mexico City, Mexico. Microbial etiology, infection sources, antibiotic resistance, and treatment outcomes were compared between patients from Spain and Mexico. <b>Results:</b> Among the 78 EE cases, 47 (60.25%) were from Spain and primarily had bacterial infections (57.1%, mainly Staphylococcus and Streptococcus). In contrast, 31 cases (39.74%) were from Mexico and had a higher prevalence of fungal infections, particularly Candida (47.1%). Diabetes mellitus was a significant risk factor, and was more common in Mexico (61.3%) than in Spain (37.0%). The Spanish cohort exhibited notable antibiotic resistance, especially in Staphylococcus. Treatment typically involved systemic and intraocular antibiotics, with vitrectomy performed in 61.5% cases. Post-treatment, bacterial infections had higher success rates (approximately 50%) compared with fungal infections (approximately 30%). Evisceration was necessary in 9% cases, and the overall mortality rate was approximately 4.4%; it was slightly higher in Mexico than in Spain. <b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights significant regional differences in EE between Spain and Mexico, particularly regarding microbial etiology and antibiotic resistance. The findings emphasize the need to adapt healthcare practices to specific regions to improve EE treatment outcomes, underscoring the importance of ongoing research and interregional collaboration to better understand and manage this complex condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13174990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ocular Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Decade Retrospective Analysis of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Spain and Mexico: A Comprehensive Study

Jorge Ivan Soberanes-Pérez, Manuel F. Bande, María José Blanco Teijeiro, Jans Fromow-Guerra et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ocular Infections and Treatments
1.62
article

Two-Decade Retrospective Analysis of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Spain and Mexico: A Comprehensive Study

Jorge Ivan Soberanes-Pérez, Manuel F. Bande, María José Blanco Teijeiro, Jans Fromow-Guerra, Laura Paniagua, María F. Golzarri, Rosario Touriño Peralba, Elia de Esteban Maciñeira
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) in Spain and Mexico, focusing on microbial patterns, antibiotic resistance, infection sources, risk factors, and patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Over 20 years, 705 endophthalmitis cases were reviewed, and we identified 78 cases of EE in Santiago de Compostela, Spain, and Mexico City, Mexico. Microbial etiology, infection sources, antibiotic resistance, and treatment outcomes were compared between patients from Spain and Mexico. <b>Results:</b> Among the 78 EE cases, 47 (60.25%) were from Spain and primarily had bacterial infections (57.1%, mainly Staphylococcus and Streptococcus). In contrast, 31 cases (39.74%) were from Mexico and had a higher prevalence of fungal infections, particularly Candida (47.1%). Diabetes mellitus was a significant risk factor, and was more common in Mexico (61.3%) than in Spain (37.0%). The Spanish cohort exhibited notable antibiotic resistance, especially in Staphylococcus. Treatment typically involved systemic and intraocular antibiotics, with vitrectomy performed in 61.5% cases. Post-treatment, bacterial infections had higher success rates (approximately 50%) compared with fungal infections (approximately 30%). Evisceration was necessary in 9% cases, and the overall mortality rate was approximately 4.4%; it was slightly higher in Mexico than in Spain. <b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights significant regional differences in EE between Spain and Mexico, particularly regarding microbial etiology and antibiotic resistance. The findings emphasize the need to adapt healthcare practices to specific regions to improve EE treatment outcomes, underscoring the importance of ongoing research and interregional collaboration to better understand and manage this complex condition.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(17)
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera en México Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ocular Infections and Treatments
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.