Transthoracic Cross Clamp versus Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Pooled Study with Subgroup Analyses

<b>Objective</b>: We assessed the available literature regarding patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) with either transthoracic clamping (TTC) or endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO). <b>Methods</b>: Original research studies that evaluated the perioperative outcomes of TTC versus EABO group were identified from 2000 to 2024. The incidence of all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and aortic dissections were the primary endpoints. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), cross-clamp, and ventilation time, along with the incidence of conversion to sternotomy, re-exploration, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), ICU stay, and LOS were the secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding the EABO cannulation approach (femoral and aortic) and MIMVS approach (video-assisted and robotic-assisted). Sensitivity analyses were performed with the leave-one-out method and by including risk-adjusted populations. <b>Results</b>: Sixteen studies were included in both the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. After pooling data from 6335 patients, both groups demonstrated similar outcomes on all primary and secondary endpoints in the non-adjusted and adjusted total cohort analyses. These outcomes were further validated by the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. In addition, the aortic cannulation EABO was associated with a lower cross-clamp time, followed by TTC and the femoral cannulation EABO approach. Furthermore, in the video-assisted subgroup analysis, the EABO approach was associated with a higher incidence of CVA, conversion to sternotomy, and longer ICU stay compared to the TTC group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The present meta-analysis indicates that both aortic occlusion techniques are safe and feasible in the context of MIMVS. A future well-designed randomized-control trial should further validate the current outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13174989
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transthoracic Cross Clamp versus Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Pooled Study with Subgroup Analyses

Arian Arjomandi Rad, Basel Ramlawi, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
article

Transthoracic Cross Clamp versus Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Pooled Study with Subgroup Analyses

Arian Arjomandi Rad, Basel Ramlawi, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Dimitrios E. Magouliotis, Αndrew Xanthopoulos, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Thanos Athanasiou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: We assessed the available literature regarding patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) with either transthoracic clamping (TTC) or endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO). <b>Methods</b>: Original research studies that evaluated the perioperative outcomes of TTC versus EABO group were identified from 2000 to 2024. The incidence of all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and aortic dissections were the primary endpoints. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), cross-clamp, and ventilation time, along with the incidence of conversion to sternotomy, re-exploration, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), ICU stay, and LOS were the secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding the EABO cannulation approach (femoral and aortic) and MIMVS approach (video-assisted and robotic-assisted). Sensitivity analyses were performed with the leave-one-out method and by including risk-adjusted populations. <b>Results</b>: Sixteen studies were included in both the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. After pooling data from 6335 patients, both groups demonstrated similar outcomes on all primary and secondary endpoints in the non-adjusted and adjusted total cohort analyses. These outcomes were further validated by the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. In addition, the aortic cannulation EABO was associated with a lower cross-clamp time, followed by TTC and the femoral cannulation EABO approach. Furthermore, in the video-assisted subgroup analysis, the EABO approach was associated with a higher incidence of CVA, conversion to sternotomy, and longer ICU stay compared to the TTC group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The present meta-analysis indicates that both aortic occlusion techniques are safe and feasible in the context of MIMVS. A future well-designed randomized-control trial should further validate the current outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(17)
Main Line Health (US), University of Thessaly (GR), Lankenau Institute for Medical Research (US), University of Oxford (GB), Lankenau Heart Institute (US), St Mary's Hospital (GB), St. Mary's Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.