O PARADOXO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO SOCIAL NO CAPITALISMO MODERNO
Modern capitalism presents an intrinsic paradox with regard to social development. On the one hand, it promotes economic growth, technological innovation and productive efficiency, factors that theoretically should improve people's quality of life and reduce social inequalities. However, in practice, capitalism often exacerbates socioeconomic disparities, creating a significant divide between rich and poor. One of the central aspects of this paradox is the concentration of wealth. In capitalist economies, wealth tends to accumulate in the hands of a minority, while the majority struggle to survive with stagnant wages and poor working conditions. This concentration of wealth can lead to a decrease in social mobility, making it difficult for individuals from lower classes to access quality education and employment opportunities. Furthermore, capitalism often prioritizes profit over social and environmental well-being. Companies may choose to cut costs in areas such as workplace safety, environmental protection and employee benefits to maximize their profits. These practices can result in significant negative impacts on the health and quality of life of working communities. Another element of the paradox is dependence on consumption. Capitalism encourages constant consumption to sustain economic growth, which can lead to household debt and the depletion of natural resources, harming long-term sustainable development.
Authors
- Maíra Prado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-9716)
- Flávio A. Fagundes
- Yuri Oliveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-8391)
- Luana Xavier Marques (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-0934)
- Roseli Adrichen Dassi
- Anderson Marques Dimari
- Matheus Quedi Bergoli
- Tabara Hirschmann
- Lucas Mezomo
- Luiz Koglin
- Elvira Franco
- Josué Pinto
Publication Details
- Journal
- Revista fisio&terapia.
- Published
- 2024-08-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ar10202408231620
- Primary Topic
- Social and Economic Solidarity
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00