The “sovereignty paradox” in China’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war

This article analyzes China's response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in light of its long-standing advocacy for state sovereignty and territorial integrity. It outlines Beijing's reaction to the invasion, examining its political and diplomatic responses, the official discourse and prevalent narratives about Ukraine in China, as well as the recent growth of Sino-Russian economic and military cooperation. In order to contextualize Beijing's position, the article summarizes the key tenets of China's foreign policy, concluding that the single most strongly and persistently advocated principle among these is the assertion of state sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference. The subsequent analysis contrasts China's (non-)response to the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity with its extremely vocal opposition to previous encroachments on state sovereignty, particularly as they pertain to China itself. It associates this "sovereignty paradox" with the fundamentally Realist (rather than normative) nature of China's foreign policy calculus vis-à-vis Russia and Ukraine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Security Policy
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2024.2391262
Citations
6
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “sovereignty paradox” in China’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war

Hangwei Li, Björn Alexander Düben
6 citations
Contemporary Security Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
13.39
article

The “sovereignty paradox” in China’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war

Hangwei Li, Björn Alexander Düben
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This article analyzes China's response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in light of its long-standing advocacy for state sovereignty and territorial integrity. It outlines Beijing's reaction to the invasion, examining its political and diplomatic responses, the official discourse and prevalent narratives about Ukraine in China, as well as the recent growth of Sino-Russian economic and military cooperation. In order to contextualize Beijing's position, the article summarizes the key tenets of China's foreign policy, concluding that the single most strongly and persistently advocated principle among these is the assertion of state sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference. The subsequent analysis contrasts China's (non-)response to the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity with its extremely vocal opposition to previous encroachments on state sovereignty, particularly as they pertain to China itself. It associates this "sovereignty paradox" with the fundamentally Realist (rather than normative) nature of China's foreign policy calculus vis-à-vis Russia and Ukraine.

Contemporary Security PolicyVol. 45(4)
German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE), Jilin University (CN), Jilin International Studies University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The “sovereignty paradox” in China’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war — Hangwei Li, Björn Alexander Düben · Contemporary Security Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS