Magnetograms underestimate even unipolar magnetic flux nearly everywhere on the solar disk

Context. The amount of magnetic flux passing through the solar surface is an important parameter determining solar activity and the heliospheric magnetic field. It is usually determined from line-of-sight magnetograms. Aims. We aim to test the reliability of determining the line-of-sight magnetic field from 3D MHD (magnetohydrodynamic) simulations of unipolar regions. In contrast to earlier similar studies, we consider the full solar disk, by considering the full centre-to-limb variation, as well as regions with different averaged field strengths. Methods. We synthesised Stokes profiles from MURaM MHD simulations of unipolar regions with varying mean vertical magnetic flux densities, ranging from quiet Sun to active region plage. We did this for a comprehensive range of heliocentric angles: from μ = 1 to μ = 0.15, and for two commonly used photospheric spectral lines: Fe I 6173.3 and Fe I 5250.2 Å. The synthesised profiles were spatially foreshortened and binned to different spatial resolutions characteristic of space-based magnetographs currently in operation. The line-of-sight magnetic field was derived with a Milne-Eddington Inversion as well as with other commonly used methods. Results. The inferred spatially averaged ⟨ B LOS ⟩ is always lower than that present in the MHD simulations, with the exception of μ ≈ 1 and sufficiently high spatial resolution. It is also generally inconsistent with a linear dependence on μ . Above μ = 0.5 the spatial resolution greatly impacts the retrieved line-of-sight magnetic field. For μ ≤ 0.5 the retrieved B LOS is nearly independent of resolution, but is always lower than expected from the simulation. These trends persist regardless of the mean vertical magnetic field in the MHD simulations and are independent of the B LOS retrieval method. For μ ≤ 0.5, a larger ⟨ B LOS ⟩ is inferred for the 5250.2 Å spectral line than 6173.3 Å, but the converse is true at higher μ . Conclusions. The obtained results show that with high spatial resolution observations, for instance those achieved with SO/PHI-HRT (High Resolution Telescope of the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on Solar Orbiter) at close perihelion, the magnetic flux can be reliably retrieved at high μ values, whereas in lower resolution observations, as well as at lower μ , a significant fraction of the magnetic flux is missed. The results found here raise some doubts of the reliability of determining the radial field by dividing the line-of-sight field by μ and are of considerable importance for deducing the total magnetic flux of the Sun. They may also contribute to the resolution of the open flux problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450267
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetograms underestimate even unipolar magnetic flux nearly everywhere on the solar disk

J. Hirzberger, T. L. Riethmüller, Damien Przybylski, J. Sinjan et al.
10 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
3.32
article

Magnetograms underestimate even unipolar magnetic flux nearly everywhere on the solar disk

J. Hirzberger, T. L. Riethmüller, Damien Przybylski, J. Sinjan, S.K. Solanki
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Context. The amount of magnetic flux passing through the solar surface is an important parameter determining solar activity and the heliospheric magnetic field. It is usually determined from line-of-sight magnetograms. Aims. We aim to test the reliability of determining the line-of-sight magnetic field from 3D MHD (magnetohydrodynamic) simulations of unipolar regions. In contrast to earlier similar studies, we consider the full solar disk, by considering the full centre-to-limb variation, as well as regions with different averaged field strengths. Methods. We synthesised Stokes profiles from MURaM MHD simulations of unipolar regions with varying mean vertical magnetic flux densities, ranging from quiet Sun to active region plage. We did this for a comprehensive range of heliocentric angles: from μ = 1 to μ = 0.15, and for two commonly used photospheric spectral lines: Fe I 6173.3 and Fe I 5250.2 Å. The synthesised profiles were spatially foreshortened and binned to different spatial resolutions characteristic of space-based magnetographs currently in operation. The line-of-sight magnetic field was derived with a Milne-Eddington Inversion as well as with other commonly used methods. Results. The inferred spatially averaged ⟨ B LOS ⟩ is always lower than that present in the MHD simulations, with the exception of μ ≈ 1 and sufficiently high spatial resolution. It is also generally inconsistent with a linear dependence on μ . Above μ = 0.5 the spatial resolution greatly impacts the retrieved line-of-sight magnetic field. For μ ≤ 0.5 the retrieved B LOS is nearly independent of resolution, but is always lower than expected from the simulation. These trends persist regardless of the mean vertical magnetic field in the MHD simulations and are independent of the B LOS retrieval method. For μ ≤ 0.5, a larger ⟨ B LOS ⟩ is inferred for the 5250.2 Å spectral line than 6173.3 Å, but the converse is true at higher μ . Conclusions. The obtained results show that with high spatial resolution observations, for instance those achieved with SO/PHI-HRT (High Resolution Telescope of the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on Solar Orbiter) at close perihelion, the magnetic flux can be reliably retrieved at high μ values, whereas in lower resolution observations, as well as at lower μ , a significant fraction of the magnetic flux is missed. The results found here raise some doubts of the reliability of determining the radial field by dividing the line-of-sight field by μ and are of considerable importance for deducing the total magnetic flux of the Sun. They may also contribute to the resolution of the open flux problem.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 690
Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE)
European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.