Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

The results of this randomized controlled trial suggest a minor overall survival benefit in endometrial cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy. Hence, the use of robotic-assisted technique in the treatment of endometrial cancer seems safe, though larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm any potential survival benefit. No alarming safety signals were detected in the robotic-assisted group since the rate of long-term complications differed only in the incidence of trocar site hernia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.028
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

Johanna Mäenpää, Synnöve Staff, Eija Tomás, Heini Huhtala et al.
21 citations
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
12.24
article

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

Johanna Mäenpää, Synnöve Staff, Eija Tomás, Heini Huhtala, Kari Nieminen, Elina Kivekäs, Minna M Mäenpää
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The results of this randomized controlled trial suggest a minor overall survival benefit in endometrial cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy. Hence, the use of robotic-assisted technique in the treatment of endometrial cancer seems safe, though larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm any potential survival benefit. No alarming safety signals were detected in the robotic-assisted group since the rate of long-term complications differed only in the incidence of trocar site hernia.

American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 232(3)
Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
12.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial — Johanna Mäenpää, Synnöve Staff, et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS