MBSE or no MBSE: is MBSE the final answer to system engineering?

In this paper we will make a revision of the usage of MBSE for an astronomy-oriented instrument. We will in particular trade the benefit Versus the overhead with respect of the traditional System engineering method. We will compare different ground-based instruments for different telescope size in different project phases. We will try then to underline where MBSE have been useful and where the criticalities of this method emerged in order to draw a possible roadmap to exploit the maximum benefit achievable by this method. In detail we will focus on four main aspects. In the first part We will compare different requirement management approaches. Second, we will focus on the Interface management which is one of the most critical elements of the system engineering discipline. We will then compare the product traditional product modelling (excel based) with respect to a database oriented one. Finally, we will assess the use cases management. We will compare traditional Versus MBSE in order to allow the reader to identify which of the two approaches better fits with its needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019989
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MBSE or no MBSE: is MBSE the final answer to system engineering?

Marco Riva, Matteo Genoni, Marcello Agostino Scalera, A. Balestra et al.
2 citations
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
0.66
article

MBSE or no MBSE: is MBSE the final answer to system engineering?

Marco Riva, Matteo Genoni, Marcello Agostino Scalera, A. Balestra, Alessio Zanutta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper we will make a revision of the usage of MBSE for an astronomy-oriented instrument. We will in particular trade the benefit Versus the overhead with respect of the traditional System engineering method. We will compare different ground-based instruments for different telescope size in different project phases. We will try then to underline where MBSE have been useful and where the criticalities of this method emerged in order to draw a possible roadmap to exploit the maximum benefit achievable by this method. In detail we will focus on four main aspects. In the first part We will compare different requirement management approaches. Second, we will focus on the Interface management which is one of the most critical elements of the system engineering discipline. We will then compare the product traditional product modelling (excel based) with respect to a database oriented one. Finally, we will assess the use cases management. We will compare traditional Versus MBSE in order to allow the reader to identify which of the two approaches better fits with its needs.

Brera Astronomical Observatory (IT), Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.