Who’s Behind the Curtain? Investors’ Reactions to Group Audit Disclosures in the Form AP

SYNOPSIS Transparency concerns related to global group audits led the PCAOB to introduce the Form AP, requiring the lead audit firm to disclose the participation and relative contribution of component audit firms in a group audit. As prior research suggests that investors fail to seek out Form AP information, this study leverages experimental design to explore investors’ reactions to group audit information directly provided to them, examining their likelihood to invest based on the percentage of audit work completed by a component audit firm and the lead audit firm’s decision to assume or divide responsibility. Results indicate that investors are less likely to invest when a larger portion of the audit is conducted by a component audit firm, regardless of whether the lead audit firm assumes or divides responsibility for the component firm’s work. These findings have significant implications for auditors, regulators, and investors concerning group audit transparency and disclosure practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Horizons
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2022-199
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who’s Behind the Curtain? Investors’ Reactions to Group Audit Disclosures in the Form AP

John D. Keyser, Jason L. Smith
Accounting Horizons
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Who’s Behind the Curtain? Investors’ Reactions to Group Audit Disclosures in the Form AP

John D. Keyser, Jason L. Smith
article en

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Transparency concerns related to global group audits led the PCAOB to introduce the Form AP, requiring the lead audit firm to disclose the participation and relative contribution of component audit firms in a group audit. As prior research suggests that investors fail to seek out Form AP information, this study leverages experimental design to explore investors’ reactions to group audit information directly provided to them, examining their likelihood to invest based on the percentage of audit work completed by a component audit firm and the lead audit firm’s decision to assume or divide responsibility. Results indicate that investors are less likely to invest when a larger portion of the audit is conducted by a component audit firm, regardless of whether the lead audit firm assumes or divides responsibility for the component firm’s work. These findings have significant implications for auditors, regulators, and investors concerning group audit transparency and disclosure practices.

Accounting HorizonsVol. 39(2)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.