Microclimate and thermal refuge influences on sage-grouse brood habitat selection

Wildlife space use is driven by three primary mechanisms, predator avoidance, foraging, and thermoregulation. The latter has largely been overlooked in wildlife research. Understanding how habitat use is influenced by thermoregulatory properties is a critical component to depicting species' ecology. Galliformes' (i.e., ground nesting birds with precocial young) ecology is predisposed to thermal extremes, where newly hatched chicks are unable to thermoregulate <14 d post-hatch, and have limited capabilities until >21 d post-hatch. We examined greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) brood rearing habitats and provide the first evaluation as to how microscale thermal environments influenced habitat selection. We monitored 24 broods, collected 82,929 black bulb temperature measurements from thermal arrays (n = 256) comprised of stainless steel black bulbs (i.e., surrogate for operative temperature) to compare brood morning (i.e., foraging, n = 78), afternoon (i.e., loafing, n = 82) and associated random locations (n = 96) between early (≤21 d post-hatch) and late (>21 d post-hatch) brood-rearing. We measured vegetation at all locations to disentangle relationships between cover and thermoregulatory metrics. We found that microclimates at all foraging locations heated more rapidly than either their loafing or random locations. Alternatively, loafing locations moderated ambient temperature more effectively than foraging locations but were similar to random locations. Broods were using loafing sites that both increased their ability to avoid predators (i.e., increased shrub structure) and buffered ambient temperature better than their foraging locations. Interestingly, random afternoon locations tended to lack concealment from predators, despite these locations showing improved thermal buffering compared to foraging locations. However, early brood-rearing habitats appeared to moderate ambient temperatures more effectively than late. Our results suggested that managing vegetation for structural heterogeneity will afford a diversity of thermal refuge for greater sage-grouse broods during this critical life history stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thermal Biology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103957
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microclimate and thermal refuge influences on sage-grouse brood habitat selection

Christopher R. Anthony, Timothy S. Bowden, Christian A. Hagen, Tyler D Dungannon
1 citations
Journal of Thermal Biology
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
0.46
article

Microclimate and thermal refuge influences on sage-grouse brood habitat selection

Christopher R. Anthony, Timothy S. Bowden, Christian A. Hagen, Tyler D Dungannon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Wildlife space use is driven by three primary mechanisms, predator avoidance, foraging, and thermoregulation. The latter has largely been overlooked in wildlife research. Understanding how habitat use is influenced by thermoregulatory properties is a critical component to depicting species' ecology. Galliformes' (i.e., ground nesting birds with precocial young) ecology is predisposed to thermal extremes, where newly hatched chicks are unable to thermoregulate <14 d post-hatch, and have limited capabilities until >21 d post-hatch. We examined greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) brood rearing habitats and provide the first evaluation as to how microscale thermal environments influenced habitat selection. We monitored 24 broods, collected 82,929 black bulb temperature measurements from thermal arrays (n = 256) comprised of stainless steel black bulbs (i.e., surrogate for operative temperature) to compare brood morning (i.e., foraging, n = 78), afternoon (i.e., loafing, n = 82) and associated random locations (n = 96) between early (≤21 d post-hatch) and late (>21 d post-hatch) brood-rearing. We measured vegetation at all locations to disentangle relationships between cover and thermoregulatory metrics. We found that microclimates at all foraging locations heated more rapidly than either their loafing or random locations. Alternatively, loafing locations moderated ambient temperature more effectively than foraging locations but were similar to random locations. Broods were using loafing sites that both increased their ability to avoid predators (i.e., increased shrub structure) and buffered ambient temperature better than their foraging locations. Interestingly, random afternoon locations tended to lack concealment from predators, despite these locations showing improved thermal buffering compared to foraging locations. However, early brood-rearing habitats appeared to moderate ambient temperatures more effectively than late. Our results suggested that managing vegetation for structural heterogeneity will afford a diversity of thermal refuge for greater sage-grouse broods during this critical life history stage.

Journal of Thermal BiologyVol. 124
Bureau of Land Management (US), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Intermountain West Joint Venture, U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.