Why don't faculty members report incidents of online abuse and what can be done about it?

The mobilization of academic research via online platforms presents a troubling paradox. Digital-first publications offer the opportunity for scholars to reach a wider audience, yet this same online vehicle for knowledge mobilization opens scholars to the risk of online abuse. Furthermore, the concept of online abuse is often misunderstood or dismissed by post-secondary institution administrators. The aim of this research is to understand why faculty members who experience online abuse do not report the such abuse to their administration, even though there is indication that support from administration is needed to manage the problem. Drawing from a series of semi-structured interviews and focus groups, this research examines the reasons why faculty members decide not to report their experiences of online abuse to their various academic administrators. A total of 11 faculty members in academic positions located North America agreed to participate in the research. We used a combination of semi-structured and narrative interview questions to understand participants’ experiences of online abuse. The data was coded using the constant comparative approach to identify emergent themes (Glaser & strauss, 1967), a nd guided by the research questions. The Theory of Planned Behavior was used to schematize the attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral controls that dissuade reporting of online abuse, and provide institutional recommendations that may encourage reporting and improve support for targeted faculty members. This study contributes to theory and practice by offering that when academic administrators foster a culture of care, faculty would be encouraged to report incidences of online abuse. • Why faculty members do not to report experiences of online abuse to administration. • Researchers conducted in depth interviews of faculty members across North America. • Significant barriers are individual, organizational , and systemic in nature. • The Theory of Planned Behavior helped to identify barriers to reporting online abuse. • Reporting can be encouraged by improving support of faculty targeted with online abuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100469
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why don't faculty members report incidents of online abuse and what can be done about it?

Victoria O’Meara, Jaigris Hodson, George Veletsianos, Esteban Morales et al.
2 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
1.29
article

Why don't faculty members report incidents of online abuse and what can be done about it?

Victoria O’Meara, Jaigris Hodson, George Veletsianos, Esteban Morales, Joan Owen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The mobilization of academic research via online platforms presents a troubling paradox. Digital-first publications offer the opportunity for scholars to reach a wider audience, yet this same online vehicle for knowledge mobilization opens scholars to the risk of online abuse. Furthermore, the concept of online abuse is often misunderstood or dismissed by post-secondary institution administrators. The aim of this research is to understand why faculty members who experience online abuse do not report the such abuse to their administration, even though there is indication that support from administration is needed to manage the problem. Drawing from a series of semi-structured interviews and focus groups, this research examines the reasons why faculty members decide not to report their experiences of online abuse to their various academic administrators. A total of 11 faculty members in academic positions located North America agreed to participate in the research. We used a combination of semi-structured and narrative interview questions to understand participants’ experiences of online abuse. The data was coded using the constant comparative approach to identify emergent themes (Glaser & strauss, 1967), a nd guided by the research questions. The Theory of Planned Behavior was used to schematize the attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral controls that dissuade reporting of online abuse, and provide institutional recommendations that may encourage reporting and improve support for targeted faculty members. This study contributes to theory and practice by offering that when academic administrators foster a culture of care, faculty would be encouraged to report incidences of online abuse. • Why faculty members do not to report experiences of online abuse to administration. • Researchers conducted in depth interviews of faculty members across North America. • Significant barriers are individual, organizational , and systemic in nature. • The Theory of Planned Behavior helped to identify barriers to reporting online abuse. • Reporting can be encouraged by improving support of faculty targeted with online abuse.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 15
University of Minnesota (US), University of Leicester (GB), Royal Roads University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.