A 30 m Global Flood Inundation Model for Any Climate Scenario

Abstract Global flood mapping has developed rapidly over the past decade, but previous approaches have limited scope, function, and accuracy. These limitations restrict the applicability and fundamental science questions that can be answered with existing model frameworks. Harnessing recently available data and modeling methods, this paper presents a new global ∼30 m resolution Global Flood Map (GFM) with complete coverage of fluvial, pluvial, and coastal perils, for any return period or climate scenario, including accounting for uncertainty. With an extensive compilation of global benchmark case studies—ranging from locally collected event water levels, to national inventories of engineering flood maps—we execute a comprehensive validation of the new GFM. For flood extent comparisons, we demonstrate that the GFM achieves a critical success index of ∼0.75. In the more discriminatory tests of flood water levels, the GFM deviates from observations by ∼0.6 m on average. Results indicating this level of global model fidelity are unprecedented in the literature. With an optimistic scenario of future warming (SSP1‐2.6), we show end‐of‐century global flood hazard (average annual inundation volume) increases are limited to 9% ( likely range ‐6%–29%); this is within the likely climatological uncertainty of −8%–12% in the current hazard estimate. In contrast, pessimistic scenario (SSP5‐8.5) hazard changes emerge from the background noise in the 2040s, rising to a 49% ( likely range of 7%–109%) increase by 2100. This work verifies the fitness‐for‐purpose of this new‐generation GFM for impact analyses with a variety of beneficial applications across policymaking, planning, and commercial risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036460
Citations
48
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 30 m Global Flood Inundation Model for Any Climate Scenario

Peter Uhe, A.H. Cooper, Simbi Hatchard, Ivan D. Haigh et al.
48 citations
Water Resources Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
13.57
article

A 30 m Global Flood Inundation Model for Any Climate Scenario

Peter Uhe, A.H. Cooper, Simbi Hatchard, Ivan D. Haigh, Paul Bates, Izzy Probyn, Niall Quinn, Nans Addor, Sam Himsworth, Hamish Wilkinson, Thomas P. Collings, Jannis Hoch, Natalie Lord, Oliver Wing, Jeffrey Neal, James Savage, Christopher Sampson, Andrew M. Smith, Josué Rodríguez González, Malcolm P. Brine, Joe Bates
article en
48 citations

Abstract

Abstract Global flood mapping has developed rapidly over the past decade, but previous approaches have limited scope, function, and accuracy. These limitations restrict the applicability and fundamental science questions that can be answered with existing model frameworks. Harnessing recently available data and modeling methods, this paper presents a new global ∼30 m resolution Global Flood Map (GFM) with complete coverage of fluvial, pluvial, and coastal perils, for any return period or climate scenario, including accounting for uncertainty. With an extensive compilation of global benchmark case studies—ranging from locally collected event water levels, to national inventories of engineering flood maps—we execute a comprehensive validation of the new GFM. For flood extent comparisons, we demonstrate that the GFM achieves a critical success index of ∼0.75. In the more discriminatory tests of flood water levels, the GFM deviates from observations by ∼0.6 m on average. Results indicating this level of global model fidelity are unprecedented in the literature. With an optimistic scenario of future warming (SSP1‐2.6), we show end‐of‐century global flood hazard (average annual inundation volume) increases are limited to 9% ( likely range ‐6%–29%); this is within the likely climatological uncertainty of −8%–12% in the current hazard estimate. In contrast, pessimistic scenario (SSP5‐8.5) hazard changes emerge from the background noise in the 2040s, rising to a 49% ( likely range of 7%–109%) increase by 2100. This work verifies the fitness‐for‐purpose of this new‐generation GFM for impact analyses with a variety of beneficial applications across policymaking, planning, and commercial risk assessment.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 60(8)
National Oceanography Centre (GB), University of Exeter (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Clifton Hospital (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Sight Research UK, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
13.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.