At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation

Thirty years ago, open sacrocolpopexy was the main route for the procedure, and at that time, most surgeons used permanent sutures to attach the mesh to the vagina. With the changes to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted routes, some urogynecologists started using delayed absorbable sutures while others continued using permanent sutures. The current data suggest no increased failures with delayed absorbable sutures. Given that the risk of suture exposure is almost eliminated with delayed absorbable sutures, it is reasonable to use delayed absorbable sutures in attaching the mesh to the vagina over permanent sutures. Regardless of the suture selection, the 10% long-term mesh exposure rate after sacrocolpopexy should prompt us to continue discussing and working on solutions to lower the mesh exposure rate and improve prolapse surgery outcomes for our patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urogynecology
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001569
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation

Sherif A. El‐Nashar
1 citations
Urogynecology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
0.47
article

At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation

Sherif A. El‐Nashar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Thirty years ago, open sacrocolpopexy was the main route for the procedure, and at that time, most surgeons used permanent sutures to attach the mesh to the vagina. With the changes to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted routes, some urogynecologists started using delayed absorbable sutures while others continued using permanent sutures. The current data suggest no increased failures with delayed absorbable sutures. Given that the risk of suture exposure is almost eliminated with delayed absorbable sutures, it is reasonable to use delayed absorbable sutures in attaching the mesh to the vagina over permanent sutures. Regardless of the suture selection, the 10% long-term mesh exposure rate after sacrocolpopexy should prompt us to continue discussing and working on solutions to lower the mesh exposure rate and improve prolapse surgery outcomes for our patients.

UrogynecologyVol. 30(9)
Jacksonville College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation — Sherif A. El‐Nashar · Urogynecology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS