Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning

Artificial neural networks, deep-learning methods and the backpropagation algorithm<sup>1</sup> form the foundation of modern machine learning and artificial intelligence. These methods are almost always used in two phases, one in which the weights of the network are updated and one in which the weights are held constant while the network is used or evaluated. This contrasts with natural learning and many applications, which require continual learning. It has been unclear whether or not deep learning methods work in continual learning settings. Here we show that they do not-that standard deep-learning methods gradually lose plasticity in continual-learning settings until they learn no better than a shallow network. We show such loss of plasticity using the classic ImageNet dataset and reinforcement-learning problems across a wide range of variations in the network and the learning algorithm. Plasticity is maintained indefinitely only by algorithms that continually inject diversity into the network, such as our continual backpropagation algorithm, a variation of backpropagation in which a small fraction of less-used units are continually and randomly reinitialized. Our results indicate that methods based on gradient descent are not enough-that sustained deep learning requires a random, non-gradient component to maintain variability and plasticity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07711-7
Citations
93
Primary Topic
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning

Richard S. Sutton, Juan Hernandez-Garcia, Qingfeng Lan, Shibhansh Dohare et al.
93 citations
Nature
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
32.31
article

Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning

Richard S. Sutton, Juan Hernandez-Garcia, Qingfeng Lan, Shibhansh Dohare, Ashique Rupam Mahmood, Parash Rahman
article en
93 citations

Abstract

Artificial neural networks, deep-learning methods and the backpropagation algorithm<sup>1</sup> form the foundation of modern machine learning and artificial intelligence. These methods are almost always used in two phases, one in which the weights of the network are updated and one in which the weights are held constant while the network is used or evaluated. This contrasts with natural learning and many applications, which require continual learning. It has been unclear whether or not deep learning methods work in continual learning settings. Here we show that they do not-that standard deep-learning methods gradually lose plasticity in continual-learning settings until they learn no better than a shallow network. We show such loss of plasticity using the classic ImageNet dataset and reinforcement-learning problems across a wide range of variations in the network and the learning algorithm. Plasticity is maintained indefinitely only by algorithms that continually inject diversity into the network, such as our continual backpropagation algorithm, a variation of backpropagation in which a small fraction of less-used units are continually and randomly reinitialized. Our results indicate that methods based on gradient descent are not enough-that sustained deep learning requires a random, non-gradient component to maintain variability and plasticity.

NatureVol. 632(8026)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), University of Alberta (CA)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, DeepMind, Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
32.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.