A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level

Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Medicine
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level

Syd Barthorpe, Lodewyk F.A. Wessels, Charlotte Tolley, Elizabeth A. Coker et al.
8 citations
Cell Reports Medicine
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
5.30
article

A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level

Syd Barthorpe, Lodewyk F.A. Wessels, Charlotte Tolley, Elizabeth A. Coker, Alexandra Beck, Laura Richardson, Patricia Jaaks, Caitlin Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Tatiana Mironenko, Nanne Aben, Ermira Lleshi, Daniël J. Vis, James Hall, Mathew J. Garnett
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.

Cell Reports MedicineVol. 5(8)
Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
5.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.